6 Cited authorities

  1. King v. Anderson Cnty.

    419 S.W.3d 232 (Tenn. 2013)   Cited 75 times
    Providing thorough discussion of cause in fact and proximate cause
  2. American International Adj. Co. v. Galvin

    86 F.3d 1455 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 111 times
    Holding that "[a]n expert who supplies nothing but a bottom line supplies nothing of value to the judicial process, and his naked opinion does not preclude summary judgment."
  3. Perez v. McConkey

    872 S.W.2d 897 (Tenn. 1994)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that implied assumption of the risk is no longer a complete bar to recovery
  4. Baggett v. Bedford Cty

    270 S.W.3d 550 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 2 times
    Explaining that “[t]he Tennessee Supreme Court abolished the defense of implied assumption of risk in [Perez v. McConkey, 872 S.W.2d 897, 905 (Tenn.1994) ]”
  5. Whitacre v. Kelly

    345 Mo. 489 (Mo. 1939)   Cited 19 times

    December 13, 1939. 1. APPEAL AND ERROR: Supplemental Statement. Where respondents filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for alleged failure to comply with the rules of the Supreme Court and thereafter appellants by leave of court filed a supplemental statement which cured the defect, the motion to dismiss is overruled. 2. WILLS: Mental Incapacity. Where a will was contested on the ground of mental incapacity and a verdict of the jury found testatrix was of unsound mind when she was alleged to have

  6. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 326,905 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit