43 Cited authorities

  1. Wright ex rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

    259 F.3d 1226 (10th Cir. 2001)   Cited 871 times
    Stating that "post-judgment motions filed within ten days of the final judgment should, where possible, be construed as 59(e) motions to avoid otherwise endless hassles over proper characterization"
  2. Allen v. Muskogee, Oklahoma

    119 F.3d 837 (10th Cir. 1997)   Cited 895 times
    Holding a rational jury could conclude officers' reckless conduct created lethal situation and that would constitute a violation of a decedent's Fourth Amendment rights
  3. Western Distributing Co. v. Diodosio

    841 P.2d 1053 (Colo. 1992)   Cited 328 times
    Listing elements for breach of contract claim in Colorado
  4. Vigil v. Franklin

    103 P.3d 322 (Colo. 2004)   Cited 206 times
    Holding that the PLA is the sole means by which an injured party can recover against a landowner
  5. Travelers v. Savio

    706 P.2d 1258 (Colo. 1985)   Cited 272 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "covered employee stands in the same position as an insured in a private insurance contract"
  6. Vaccaro v. American Family Ins. Grp.

    275 P.3d 750 (Colo. App. 2012)   Cited 104 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "course of conduct" may be a valid bad faith theory
  7. Nelson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    419 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir. 2005)   Cited 97 times
    Holding plaintiff knew at least by the last date of payment under basic PIP policy that he was not receiving extended PIP benefits
  8. Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    319 F.3d 1234 (10th Cir. 2003)   Cited 101 times
    Holding that "[t]he fact that the insured may be entitled to obtain a reformation of the policy does not impose any obligation upon the insurer to conform to such `reformed' policy before a court has made such reformation"
  9. Crowe v. Tull

    126 P.3d 196 (Colo. 2006)   Cited 89 times
    Holding that one of the elements of a claim under the CCPA is a finding that the unfair or deceptive practice "significantly impacts the public as actual or potential consumers of the defendant's goods, services, or property"
  10. Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mut. Ins. Co.

    961 P.2d 550 (Colo. App. 1998)   Cited 91 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding insurance company "was not obligated to pay the additional PIP benefits until the policy was reformed"
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 278,986 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 10-3-1115 - Improper denial of claims - prohibited - definitions - severability

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-3-1115   Cited 376 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting insurers from unreasonably denying or delaying payment for benefits owed to a first-party claimant
  13. Section 13-80-101 - General limitation of actions - three years

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-101   Cited 152 times
    Stating that "[a]ll contract actions" must be commenced "within three years after the cause of action accrues, and not thereafter"
  14. Section 13-80-103 - General limitation of actions - one year

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103   Cited 62 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that "[a]ll actions for any penalty or forfeiture of any penal statutes" be commenced within one year after the action accrues
  15. Section 13-22-201 - Definitions

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-22-201   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses

    As used in this part 2, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Arbitration organization" means an association, agency, board, commission, or other entity that is neutral and initiates, sponsors, or administers an arbitration proceeding or is involved in the appointment of an arbitrator. (2) "Arbitrator" means an individual appointed to render an award, alone or with others, in a controversy that is subject to an agreement to arbitrate. (3) "Court" means a court of competent jurisdiction in this

  16. Section 6-1-115 - Limitations

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-115   Cited 15 times

    All actions brought under this article must be commenced within three years after the date on which the false, misleading, or deceptive act or practice occurred or the date on which the last in a series of such acts or practices occurred or within three years after the consumer discovered or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered the occurrence of the false, misleading, or deceptive act or practice. The period of limitation provided in this section may be extended for a period

  17. Section 10-4-635 - Medical payments coverage - definitions

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-4-635   Cited 12 times
    Requiring the summary disclosures to contain, among other things "an explanation of the major coverages and exclusions"
  18. Section 10-4-636 - Disclosure requirements for automobile insurance products offered - rules

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-4-636   Cited 2 times
    Requiring summary disclosure forms to "include a disclosure specifying that * * * [Med-Pay] coverage pays for reasonable health care expenses incurred for bodily injury caused by an automobile accident, regardless of fault, up to the policy limits chosen by the insured"