Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

Tellabs v. Makor Issues Rights

Holding that a strong inference is one that is "cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference"

Simon v. E. Ky. Welfare Rights Org.

Holding plaintiffs who sued IRS lacked standing where they hoped reversal of IRS rule would " ‘discourage’ hospitals from denying their services to" plaintiffs, but whether hospitals had denied services based on the existing rule remained unclear and, even if the rule were reversed, hospitals would remain free to not provide services to plaintiffs

ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.

Holding that because "a plaintiff must show . . . a primary violation by the controlled person" in order to "establish a prima facie case of control[-]person liability," a plaintiff who "fails to allege any primary violation . . . cannot establish control[-]person liability"

Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.

Holding that mere economic loss does not amount to an antitrust injury under the antitrust laws

Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Co.

Holding that Erie doctrine applies to conflict-of-law rules

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.

Holding that an antitrust injury is an injury that is "attributable to an anti-competitive aspect of the practice under scrutiny"

In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation

Holding that per se "hub and spoke" theory was not properly pled when complaint detailed specific agreements between multiple insurers and a single broker, but did not allege facts such that the court could infer that the insurers had agreed horizontally to enter into their respective agreements with the broker

Koch v. Christie's International PLC

Holding that discovery accrual rule announced in Rotella continues to be controlling law

Corsello v. Verizon N.Y., Inc.

Holding that "[t]o the extent that these claims succeed, the unjust enrichment claim is duplicative; if plaintiffs' other claims are defective, an unjust enrichment claim cannot remedy the defects"

Section 78j - Manipulative and deceptive devices

Granting SEC power to establish rules to further statute forbidding manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with purchase or sale of securities

Section 15 - Suits by persons injured

Granting private right of action to anyone who has been injured "by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws ..."

Section 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty

Forbidding every "contract, combination . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States"

Section 15b - Limitation of actions

Establishing a four-year limitations period for antitrust claims

Section 202 - Cause of action accruing without the state

Limiting the limitations period for causes of action accruing outside of New York where the foreign jurisdiction imposes a shorter statute of limitations than the state does

Section 2 - Jurisdiction of Commission; liability of principal for act of agent; Commodity Futures Trading Commission; transaction in interstate commerce

Adopting respondeat superior principles for regulatory actions brought by the Commodity Exchange Commission

Section 1a - Definitions

Defining "excluded commodity" under Commodity Exchange Act

Section 9 - Prohibition regarding manipulation and false information

Authorizing the CFTC to seek to prohibit from future trading any person who "has willfully made any false or misleading statement of a material fact in any registration application or any report filed with the Commission"

Section 25 - Private rights of action

Granting federal courts exclusive jurisdiction over private claims brought under the CEA

Section 13 - Violations generally; punishment; costs of prosecution

Pertaining to punishment for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act

Section 180.1 - Prohibition on the employment, or attempted employment, of manipulative and deceptive devices

Focusing on the use or employment, or attempted use or employment of any manipulative device, scheme, or artifice to defraud in connection with, as relevant here, any swap

Section 180.2 - Prohibition on price manipulation

Section 160.3 - Definitions