§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Martin Johnson, Appellant.

Brief

71 Cited authorities

  1. Batson v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 79 (1986)   Cited 15,224 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes

  2. Waller v. Georgia

    467 U.S. 39 (1984)   Cited 2,087 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant's public trial right was violated even though the district court released a transcript of the closed proceedings to the public

  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California

    464 U.S. 501 (1984)   Cited 1,757 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that media have a right of access to voir dire

  4. Presley v. Georgia

    558 U.S. 209 (2010)   Cited 632 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment applies to jury selection

  5. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia

    448 U.S. 555 (1980)   Cited 1,643 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that criminaltrials must be open to the public

  6. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court

    457 U.S. 596 (1982)   Cited 1,465 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that safeguarding well-being of minor is compelling and may justify closure of criminal trial from public access

  7. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court

    478 U.S. 1 (1986)   Cited 1,210 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a criminal proceeding may be closed to protect the accused's right to a fair trial only if doing so is "narrowly tailored to serve that interest," meaning that "there is a substantial probability that the defendant's right to a fair trial will be prejudiced by publicity that closure would prevent" and that "reasonable alternatives to closure cannot adequately protect the defendant's fair trial rights" (quoting Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct., 464 U.S. 501, 510, 104 S.Ct. 819, 78 L.Ed.2d 629 (1984) )

  8. Sheppard v. Maxwell

    384 U.S. 333 (1966)   Cited 2,245 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that media coverage contributed to due process violation in murder trial that "intrigue[d] and captivate[d] the public fancy to a degree perhaps unparalleled in recent annals"

  9. Gannett Co. v. Depasquale

    443 U.S. 368 (1979)   Cited 952 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the public has no constitutional right to attend pre-trial proceedings

  10. Estes v. Texas

    381 U.S. 532 (1965)   Cited 1,406 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that televising the trial, over defendant's objection, violated Due Process