43 Cited authorities

Illinois v. Gates
462 U.S. 213 (1983) Cited 18,905 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"
Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 (1968) Cited 38,110 times 73 Legal Analyses
Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop
Illinois v. Wardlow
528 U.S. 119 (2000) Cited 5,072 times 32 Legal Analyses
Holding "refusal to cooperate, without more, does not furnish the minimal level of objective justification needed for a detention or seizure." (quoting Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437 (1991))
Kolender v. Lawson
461 U.S. 352 (1983) Cited 3,033 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding state misdemeanor statute unconstitutionally vague within the meaning of the Due Process Clause
Spinelli v. United States
393 U.S. 410 (1969) Cited 5,504 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "assertion of police suspicion" cannot save an otherwise insufficient warrant affidavit
Chicago v. Morales
527 U.S. 41 (1999) Cited 1,297 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that vagueness that "fails to establish standards for the police and public that are sufficient to guard against the arbitrary deprivation of liberty interests" is subject to facial challenge
Brown v. Texas
443 U.S. 47 (1979) Cited 2,218 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that officers could not require an individual who merely "looked suspicious" to identify himself absent "a reasonable suspicion that he was involved in criminal conduct"
Ybarra v. Illinois
444 U.S. 85 (1979) Cited 1,946 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that a search warrant for a tavern and its bartender did not permit body searches of all the bar's patrons
Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville
405 U.S. 156 (1972) Cited 1,519 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding vague an ordinance that punished “vagrants,” defined to include “rogues and vagabonds,” “persons who use juggling,” and “common night walkers”
People v. Huggins
38 Cal.4th 175 (Cal. 2006) Cited 871 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding no ineffective assistance of counsel where counsel's failure to object could be explained as a tactical decision not to draw the jurors' attention to comments by the prosecutor

The People, Respondent,v.Todd Johnson, Appellant.

43 Cited authorities

Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"

Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

Holding "refusal to cooperate, without more, does not furnish the minimal level of objective justification needed for a detention or seizure." (quoting Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437 (1991))

Holding state misdemeanor statute unconstitutionally vague within the meaning of the Due Process Clause

Holding that the "assertion of police suspicion" cannot save an otherwise insufficient warrant affidavit

Holding that vagueness that "fails to establish standards for the police and public that are sufficient to guard against the arbitrary deprivation of liberty interests" is subject to facial challenge

Holding that officers could not require an individual who merely "looked suspicious" to identify himself absent "a reasonable suspicion that he was involved in criminal conduct"

Holding that a search warrant for a tavern and its bartender did not permit body searches of all the bar's patrons

Holding vague an ordinance that punished “vagrants,” defined to include “rogues and vagabonds,” “persons who use juggling,” and “common night walkers”

Finding no ineffective assistance of counsel where counsel's failure to object could be explained as a tactical decision not to draw the jurors' attention to comments by the prosecutor