14 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Gonzalez

    68 N.Y.2d 424 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 984 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In People v Gonzalez (68 NY2d 424 [1986]), we set forth the conditions necessary to warrant a missing witness charge and a burden-shifting analysis to determine whether those conditions are met.
  2. People v. Whalen

    59 N.Y.2d 273 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 446 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Whalen, the defendant argued that identification evidence is "always suspect, so that, when a trial involves a close question of identity, the jury should receive an instruction emphasizing the scrutiny to be given to such evidence.
  3. People v. Hayes

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 3887 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 103 times

    No. 79. Argued March 23, 2011. Decided May 10, 2011. APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered April 6, 2010. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), which had convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. People v Hayes

  4. People v. Handy

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2103 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 81 times
    In Handy, a police surveillance system created a series of images depicting a portion of the defendant's alleged jailhouse assault on some sheriff's deputies, and those images remained in the possession of the police (see id. at 666, 966 N.Y.S.2d 351, 988 N.E.2d 879).
  5. U.S. v. Rose

    104 F.3d 1408 (1st Cir. 1997)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court may hold that an error was harmless even if the government does not make that argument, because of the seemingly mandatory text of Fed.R.Crim.P. 52 and the policy interest in conserving judicial resources
  6. People v. James

    93 N.Y.2d 620 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 83 times
    Emphasizing lack of motivation to lie to trusted friend
  7. People v. Saunders

    64 N.Y.2d 665 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 112 times

    Argued November 12, 1984 Decided December 11, 1984 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, John R. Starkey, J. Elizabeth Holtzman, District Attorney ( Evan Wolfson and Barbara D. Underwood of counsel), for appellant. Edwin Ira Schulman for respondents. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to it for a review of the facts (CPL 470.25, subd 2, par [d]; 470.40, subd 2, par [b]) and for consideration

  8. People v. Knight

    87 N.Y.2d 873 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 75 times

    Argued November 27, 1995 Decided December 27, 1995 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Dominic R. Massaro, J. Elizabeth Sack Felber, New York City, and Daniel L. Greenberg for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney of Bronx County, Bronx (Lisa I. Cuevas, Joseph N. Ferdenzi and Allen H. Saperstein of counsel), for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant has been convicted of criminal sale

  9. People v. Reid

    69 N.Y.2d 469 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 57 times
    In Reid, however, we chose not to resolve this issue, focusing instead on "whether a good-faith claim of right, which negates larcenous intent in certain thefts, also negates the intent to commit robbery by a defendant who uses force to recover cash allegedly owed him" (id. at 472 [citation omitted]).
  10. The People v. McMillon

    77 A.D.3d 1375 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 18 times

    No. KA 09-00533. October 1, 2010. Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered February 26, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. EASTON THOMPSON KASPEREK SHIFFRIN LLP, ROCHESTER (BRIAN SHIFFRIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY