36 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 52,825 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a suspect "must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation"
  2. Arizona v. Fulminante

    499 U.S. 279 (1991)   Cited 4,635 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the doctrine of harmless error applies to the violation of the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination through the admission at trial of an involuntary confession
  3. Corley v. United States

    556 U.S. 303 (2009)   Cited 595 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts must decide whether the delay beyond six hours was reasonable before admitting any confession made after that period
  4. People v. Mateo

    2 N.Y.3d 383 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 2,599 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding criminal liability attaches to "a person concerned in the commission of a crime whether he directly commits the act constituting the offense or aids and abets in its commission . . ."
  5. People v. Crimmins

    36 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 5,141 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an error is prejudicial "if an appellate court concludes that there is a significant probability, rather than only a rational possibility, in the particular case that the jury would have acquitted the defendant had it not been for the error or errors which occurred"
  6. Culombe v. Connecticut

    367 U.S. 568 (1961)   Cited 1,371 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding involuntary the confession extracted from a “thirty-three-year-old mental defective ... with an intelligence quotient of sixty-four”
  7. Mallory v. United States

    354 U.S. 449 (1957)   Cited 1,113 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the confession made by the defendant while in custody is inadmissible because the defendant's untimely arraignment under Rule 5 rendered his custody unlawful
  8. People v. De Bour

    40 N.Y.2d 210 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 2,074 times   6 Legal Analyses
    In People v. LaPene, 352 N.E.2d 562 (N.Y. 1976), the New York Court of Appeals laid out a sliding scale of justifiable police intrusion, short of probable cause to arrest, which specified three distinct levels of intrusion correlating the allowable intensity of police conduct to the nature and weight of the facts precipitating the intrusion.
  9. People v. Gonzalez

    68 N.Y.2d 424 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 927 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In People v Gonzalez (68 NY2d 424 [1986]), we set forth the conditions necessary to warrant a missing witness charge and a burden-shifting analysis to determine whether those conditions are met.
  10. Haley v. Ohio

    332 U.S. 596 (1948)   Cited 765 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding 15-year-old's confession was taken in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights where juvenile, without being informed of his right to counsel and without "friend or counsel," signed a confession prepared by the police after being shown the alleged confessions of his cohorts and subjected to continuous interrogation by a rotation of several police officers from midnight to 5 a.m.