36 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 60,216 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment
  2. Arizona v. Fulminante

    499 U.S. 279 (1991)   Cited 5,281 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that involuntary confessions are subject to harmless-error review
  3. Corley v. United States

    556 U.S. 303 (2009)   Cited 751 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "statute should be construed so that effect is given to all its provisions, so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous"
  4. People v. Mateo

    2 N.Y.3d 383 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 3,444 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding criminal liability attaches to "a person concerned in the commission of a crime whether he directly commits the act constituting the offense or aids and abets in its commission . . ."
  5. People v. Crimmins

    36 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 5,681 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an error is prejudicial "if an appellate court concludes that there is a significant probability, rather than only a rational possibility, in the particular case that the jury would have acquitted the defendant had it not been for the error or errors which occurred"
  6. Culombe v. Connecticut

    367 U.S. 568 (1961)   Cited 1,441 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding involuntary the confession extracted from a “thirty-three-year-old mental defective ... with an intelligence quotient of sixty-four”
  7. Mallory v. United States

    354 U.S. 449 (1957)   Cited 1,138 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the confession made by the defendant while in custody is inadmissible because the defendant's untimely arraignment under Rule 5 rendered his custody unlawful
  8. People v. De Bour

    40 N.Y.2d 210 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 2,265 times   6 Legal Analyses
    In People v. LaPene, 352 N.E.2d 562 (N.Y. 1976), the New York Court of Appeals laid out a sliding scale of justifiable police intrusion, short of probable cause to arrest, which specified three distinct levels of intrusion correlating the allowable intensity of police conduct to the nature and weight of the facts precipitating the intrusion.
  9. People v. Gonzalez

    68 N.Y.2d 424 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 984 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In People v Gonzalez (68 NY2d 424 [1986]), we set forth the conditions necessary to warrant a missing witness charge and a burden-shifting analysis to determine whether those conditions are met.
  10. People v. Bigelow

    66 N.Y.2d 417 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 854 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the "good-faith exception" to the warrant requirement