47 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 52,767 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a suspect "must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have the lawyer with him during interrogation"
  2. Berkemer v. McCarty

    468 U.S. 420 (1984)   Cited 4,888 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding the "noncoercive aspect of ordinary traffic stops prompts us to hold that persons temporarily detained pursuant to such stops are not ‘in custody’ for the purposes of Miranda "
  3. Dickerson v. United States

    530 U.S. 428 (2000)   Cited 1,950 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the protections announced in Miranda ” are “constitutionally required”
  4. Mincey v. Arizona

    437 U.S. 385 (1978)   Cited 3,312 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while statements obtained in violation of Miranda may be used for impeachment if otherwise trustworthy, the Constitution prohibits " any criminal trial use against a defendant of his involuntary statement"
  5. Fare v. Michael C.

    442 U.S. 707 (1979)   Cited 1,470 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers' remarks to a sixteen-year-old juvenile that a cooperative attitude would be to his benefit were far from threatening or coercive where he was thoroughly informed of his Miranda rights and the officers' questioning was "restrained and free from the abuses that so concerned the Court in Miranda"
  6. People v. Mateo

    2 N.Y.3d 383 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 2,592 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding criminal liability attaches to "a person concerned in the commission of a crime whether he directly commits the act constituting the offense or aids and abets in its commission . . ."
  7. Culombe v. Connecticut

    367 U.S. 568 (1961)   Cited 1,368 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding involuntary the confession extracted from a “thirty-three-year-old mental defective ... with an intelligence quotient of sixty-four”
  8. Rogers v. Richmond

    365 U.S. 534 (1961)   Cited 1,131 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trial court must focus "on the question whether the behavior of the State's law enforcement officials was such as to overbear petitioner's will to resist and bring about confessions not freely self-determined—a question to be answered with complete disregard of whether or not petitioner in fact spoke the truth"
  9. Davis v. North Carolina

    384 U.S. 737 (1966)   Cited 776 times
    Holding that confessions at issue were not freely and voluntarily made and thus were constitutionally inadmissible
  10. People v. Gonzalez

    68 N.Y.2d 424 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 926 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In People v Gonzalez (68 NY2d 424 [1986]), we set forth the conditions necessary to warrant a missing witness charge and a burden-shifting analysis to determine whether those conditions are met.