§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Highbridge Broadway, LLC, Appellant,v.Assessor of the City of Schenectady, Respondent, Schenectady City School District, Respondent.

Brief

20 Cited authorities

  1. Finnerty v. New York State Thruway Authority

    75 N.Y.2d 721 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 684 times

    Argued October 11, 1989 Decided November 30, 1989 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, Jerome F. Hanifin, J. David M. Hehr for appellant. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Kathleen Liston Morrison, O. Peter Sherwood and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Claimant obtained an order from the Court of Claims granting permission to file a late claim against the

  2. In re Walton

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8665 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 101 times
    In Walton, the Department of Correctional Services contracted with a telecommunications company to provide phone service in prisons.

  3. Video Aid v. Town of Wallkill

    85 N.Y.2d 663 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 36 times

    Argued March 29, 1995 Decided May 11, 1995 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Howard Miller, J. Monte J. Rosenstein, Middletown, for appellant. Burt J. Blustein, Middletown, for respondents. CIPARICK, J. Plaintiffs remitted $27,000 to defendant in satisfaction of sewer and water tap-in fees due in conjunction with their application for a building permit to proceed with their planned renovation of new business premises in Wallkill. The fees,

  4. Rochester v. Chiarella

    58 N.Y.2d 316 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 47 times
    Observing that the “imposition of a lien and/or exaction of interest, without more, falls short of what is to be recognized as duress in context” of a payment made to relieve a lien

  5. Torok Trust v. Town Bd. of Alexandria

    128 A.D.3d 97 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 6 times

    375 CA 14-01460 03-27-2015 IN THE MATTER OF THE TOROK TRUST, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA, TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA, TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW AND ASSESSOR OF TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA, RESPONDENTS. ??????????????????????? ALEXANDRIA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, APPELLANT. O'HARA, O'CONNELL & CIOTOLI, FAYETTEVILLE (STEPHEN CIOTOLI OF COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT. ANTONUCCI LAW FIRM, LLP, WATERTOWN (DAVID P. ANTONUCCI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. CENTRA, J.P

  6. Corporate Prop. Investors v. Bd. of Assessors

    153 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)   Cited 33 times
    Holding that commencement of declaratory judgment action challenging tax assessment satisfied the requirement of protest at time of payment

  7. Matter Sterling v. Assessors

    66 N.Y.2d 122 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 38 times
    In Sterling Estates, we held that a taxpayer who failed to register a timely protest as required by State law was not entitled to judicial review.

  8. Jonsher Realty Corp./Melba, Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors

    118 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 4 times

    2014-06-11 In the Matter of JONSHER REALTY CORP./MELBA, INC., respondent, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS, et al., appellants. Carnell T. Foskey, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Dennis J. Saffran and Daniel K. Valentino of counsel), for appellants. Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, East Meadow, N.Y. (Dale Allinson of counsel), for respondent. PETER B. SKELOS Carnell T. Foskey, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Dennis J. Saffran and Daniel K. Valentino of counsel), for appellants. Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman

  9. Circulo Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v. Assessor of Long Beach

    96 A.D.3d 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 5 times

    2012-06-27 In the Matter of CIRCULO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION, appellant, v. ASSESSOR OF CITY OF LONG BEACH, Nassau County, New York, et al., respondents. Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Robert L. Schonfeld of counsel), for appellant. Corey E. Klein, Corporation Counsel, Long Beach, N.Y. (Noreen O. Costello and Gregory Kalnitsky of counsel), for respondents. WILLIAM F. MASTRO Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Robert L. Schonfeld of counsel), for appellant. Corey

  10. Matter of Bowery Savings Bank v. Board of Assessors

    605 N.E.2d 363 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 20 times

    Argued September 17, 1992 Decided October 29, 1992 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Leo F. McGinity. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton Garrison, New York City (Leslie Gordon Fagen, Aidan Synnott and Andrew B. Gelman of counsel), for appellants. Keoppel Martone Leistman Herman, Mineola (Donald F. Leistman of counsel), for Bowery Savings Bank and others, respondents. Farrell, Fritz, Caemmerer, Cleary, Barnosky Armentano, P.C., Uniondale (Dolores