§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Highbridge Broadway, LLC, Appellant,v.Assessor of the City of Schenectady, Respondent, Schenectady City School District, Respondent.

Brief

20 Cited authorities

  1. Finnerty v. New York State Thruway Authority

    75 N.Y.2d 721 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 704 times
    Addressing the jurisdictional nature of the service provisions of section 11

  2. In re Walton

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8665 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 118 times
    In Walton, the Department of Correctional Services contracted with a telecommunications company to provide phone service in prisons.

  3. Video Aid v. Town of Wallkill

    85 N.Y.2d 663 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 38 times
    Finding likely disruption of a tight renovation schedule without prompt payment of water and sewer tap-in fees insufficient to constitute duress or coercion

  4. Rochester v. Chiarella

    58 N.Y.2d 316 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 49 times
    Observing that the “imposition of a lien and/or exaction of interest, without more, falls short of what is to be recognized as duress in context” of a payment made to relieve a lien

  5. Matter Sterling v. Assessors

    66 N.Y.2d 122 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 40 times
    In Sterling, however, we did not suggest-much less decide-that the owner of a property must file the administrative complaint.

  6. Torok Trust v. Town Bd. of Alexandria

    128 A.D.3d 97 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 6 times

    375 CA 14-01460 03-27-2015 IN THE MATTER OF THE TOROK TRUST, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA, TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA, TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW AND ASSESSOR OF TOWN OF ALEXANDRIA, RESPONDENTS. ??????????????????????? ALEXANDRIA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, APPELLANT. O'HARA, O'CONNELL & CIOTOLI, FAYETTEVILLE (STEPHEN CIOTOLI OF COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT. ANTONUCCI LAW FIRM, LLP, WATERTOWN (DAVID P. ANTONUCCI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. CENTRA, J.P

  7. Corporate Prop. Investors v. Bd. of Assessors

    153 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)   Cited 33 times
    Holding that commencement of declaratory judgment action challenging tax assessment satisfied the requirement of protest at time of payment

  8. Circulo Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v. Assessor of Long Beach

    96 A.D.3d 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 7 times

    2012-06-27 In the Matter of CIRCULO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION, appellant, v. ASSESSOR OF CITY OF LONG BEACH, Nassau County, New York, et al., respondents. Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Robert L. Schonfeld of counsel), for appellant. Corey E. Klein, Corporation Counsel, Long Beach, N.Y. (Noreen O. Costello and Gregory Kalnitsky of counsel), for respondents. WILLIAM F. MASTRO Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Robert L. Schonfeld of counsel), for appellant. Corey

  9. Jonsher Realty Corp./Melba, Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors

    118 A.D.3d 787 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 5 times

    2014-06-11 In the Matter of JONSHER REALTY CORP./MELBA, INC., respondent, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS, et al., appellants. Carnell T. Foskey, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Dennis J. Saffran and Daniel K. Valentino of counsel), for appellants. Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, East Meadow, N.Y. (Dale Allinson of counsel), for respondent. PETER B. SKELOS Carnell T. Foskey, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Dennis J. Saffran and Daniel K. Valentino of counsel), for appellants. Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman

  10. Frei v. Town of Livingston

    50 A.D.3d 1381 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 6 times

    No. 503638. April 17, 2008. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Egan, Jr., J.), entered January 18, 2007 in Columbia County, which, in a combined proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7 and/or CPLR article 78 and action for declaratory judgment, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition/complaint. Corbally, Gartland Rappleyea, Poughkeepsie (William W. Frame of counsel), for appellants. Robert J. Fitzsimmons, Valatie, for respondents. Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen and Malone