§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Gregory Lee, Appellant.

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. Colorado v. Bertine

    479 U.S. 367 (1987)   Cited 1,838 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the decision to seize need be "on the basis of something other than suspicion of evidence of criminal activity"

  2. People v. Robinson

    97 N.Y.2d 341 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 492 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Declining to distinguish between criminal and traffic violations for the purposes of searches and seizures under New York law

  3. People v. Johnson

    1 N.Y.3d 252 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 111 times
    Following a lawful arrest of the driver of an automobile that must then be impounded, the police may conduct an inventory search of the vehicle

  4. People v. Galak

    80 N.Y.2d 715 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 134 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Argued January 5, 1993 Decided February 16, 1993 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Zelda Jonas, J. Mahler Harris, P.C., Kew Gardens (Stephen R. Mahler of counsel), for appellant. Denis Dillon, District Attorney of Nassau County, Mineola (Lawrence J. Schwarz and Peter A. Weinstein of counsel), for respondent. Acting Chief Judge SIMONS. Defendant has been convicted of several criminal possession charges based upon incriminating evidence found

  5. People v. Padilla

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4042 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 48 times

    2013-06-6 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth PADILLA, Appellant. Randall D. Unger, Bayside, for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Matthew T. Murphy and Christopher P. Marinelli of counsel), for respondent. PIGOTT Randall D. Unger, Bayside, for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Matthew T. Murphy and Christopher P. Marinelli of counsel), for respondent. OPINION OF THE COURT PIGOTT, J. The issue on this appeal is

  6. People v. Valentin

    29 N.Y.3d 57 (N.Y. 2017)   Cited 21 times

    03-30-2017 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Carlos VALENTIN, Respondent. James A. McCarty, Special Acting District Attorney, White Plains (Virginia A. Marciano, Laurie G. Sapakoff and Steven A. Bender of counsel), for appellant. Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City, for respondent. ABDUS–SALAAM, J. James A. McCarty, Special Acting District Attorney, White Plains (Virginia A. Marciano, Laurie G. Sapakoff and Steven A. Bender of counsel), for appellant. Robert

  7. People v. Tardi

    2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7822 (N.Y. 2016)   Cited 21 times

    11-21-2016 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wilson J. TARDI, Appellant. Phil Modrzynski, Buffalo, and Thomas J. Eoannou, Buffalo, for appellant. Michael J. Flaherty, Jr., Acting District Attorney, Buffalo (Matthew B. Powers and Michael J. Hillery of counsel), for respondent. Phil Modrzynski, Buffalo, and Thomas J. Eoannou, Buffalo, for appellant. Michael J. Flaherty, Jr., Acting District Attorney, Buffalo (Matthew B. Powers and Michael J. Hillery of counsel), for respondent. OPINION

  8. U.S. v. Proctor

    489 F.3d 1348 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 22 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring standardized procedures to be followed

  9. United States v. Cervantes

    678 F.3d 798 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 11 times

    No. 09–50521. 2012-05-16 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Jesus Antonio Ramos CERVANTES, Defendant–Appellant. Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellant. Kevin S. Rosenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee. PREGERSON Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellant. Kevin S. Rosenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for the

  10. United States v. Vladeff

    630 F. App'x 998 (11th Cir. 2015)   Cited 6 times

    No. 15-10947 11-04-2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSEPH PAUL VLADEFF, Defendant-Appellant. PER CURIAM [DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00210-CEH-MAP-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before WILSON, JORDAN, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Joseph Vladeff appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search of a truck he was driving in Pasco County,

  11. Section 470.35 - Determination by court of appeals of appeals from orders of intermediate appellate courts; scope of review

    N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 470.35   Cited 88 times

    1. Upon an appeal to the court of appeals from an order of an intermediate appellate court affirming a judgment, sentence or order of a criminal court, the court of appeals may consider and determine not only questions of law which were raised or considered upon the appeal to the intermediate appellate court, but also any question of law involving alleged error or defect in the criminal court proceedings resulting in the original criminal court judgment, sentence or order, regardless of whether such