30 Cited authorities

  1. Arizona v. Gant

    556 U.S. 332 (2009)   Cited 3,214 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a search incident to a lawful arrest is one conducted "as long as the administrative processes incident to the arrest and custody have not been completed."
  2. Coolidge v. New Hampshire

    403 U.S. 443 (1971)   Cited 7,354 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a search or seizure carried out on a suspect's premises without a warrant is per se unreasonable, unless the police can show that it falls within one of a carefully defined set of exceptions based on the presence of exigent circumstances"
  3. Wong Sun v. United States

    371 U.S. 471 (1963)   Cited 11,427 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence was inadmissible because it was obtained by exploiting "illegal actions of the police
  4. United States v. Ross

    456 U.S. 798 (1982)   Cited 3,606 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that search under the automobile exception extends only to areas "that may conceal the object of the search"
  5. Colorado v. Bertine

    479 U.S. 367 (1987)   Cited 1,578 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the decision to seize need be "on the basis of something other than suspicion of evidence of criminal activity"
  6. California v. Acevedo

    500 U.S. 565 (1991)   Cited 1,289 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Fourth Amendment does not preclude a warrantless search of a container in an automobile where there is probable cause to believe that it contains contraband
  7. People v. De Bour

    40 N.Y.2d 210 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 2,071 times   6 Legal Analyses
    In People v. LaPene, 352 N.E.2d 562 (N.Y. 1976), the New York Court of Appeals laid out a sliding scale of justifiable police intrusion, short of probable cause to arrest, which specified three distinct levels of intrusion correlating the allowable intensity of police conduct to the nature and weight of the facts precipitating the intrusion.
  8. People v. Bigelow

    66 N.Y.2d 417 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 731 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In People v Bigelow (66 N.Y.2d 417), this Court declined to apply the good-faith exception to the exclusionary adopted by the Supreme Court in United States v Leon (468 U.S. 897).
  9. People v. Robinson

    97 N.Y.2d 341 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 378 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Declining to distinguish between criminal and traffic violations for the purposes of searches and seizures under New York law
  10. People v. Belton

    55 N.Y.2d 49 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 317 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding greater protection under state constitution despite similar wording of relevant federal and state search and seizure provision
  11. Section 3362 - [Repealed Effective six months after full cannabis control board created by Cannabis Law has been appointed] and[Repealed Effective 7/5/2028] Lawful medical use

    N.Y. Pub. Health Law § 3362   Cited 1 times   2 Legal Analyses

    1. The possession, acquisition, use, delivery, transfer, transportation, or administration of medical marihuana by a certified patient or designated caregiver possessing a valid registry identification card, for certified medical use, shall be lawful under this title; provided that: (a) the marihuana that may be possessed by a certified patient shall not exceed a thirty day supply of the dosage as determined by the practitioner, consistent with any guidance and regulations issued by the commissioner