§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Mario Arjune, Appellant.

Brief

3 Cited authorities

  1. Roe v. Flores-Ortega

    528 U.S. 470 (2000)   Cited 5,718 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding in criminal habeas context that counsel's failure to file a timely appeal is presumptively prejudicial, with no need for a "further showing from the defendant of the merits of his underlying claims"

  2. People v. Perez

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2326 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 30 times
    In People v Perez, 23 NY3d 89 (2014), we denied coram nobis relief to all three defendants based on "two compelling facts [that] stand out in all three cases: the delays were extremely long, and the defendants did not have a good excuse for them."

  3. People v. West

    100 N.Y.2d 23 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 26 times
    In West, the petitioner incorrectly filed habeas corpus actions in state court before exhausting his state court appeals.