§Why CasetextPricing

Island Park, LLC, Appellant,v.State of New York, Respondent.

Brief

24 Cited authorities

  1. Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City

    438 U.S. 104 (1978)   Cited 2,579 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Holding prohibition on construction of fifty-five-story office tower over New York's Grand Central Terminal is not a regulatory taking

  2. Andrus v. Allard

    444 U.S. 51 (1979)   Cited 420 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government’s restriction on an individual’s ability to dispose of his or her private property did not amount to a taking because the individual retained other rights associated with his or her property

  3. People v. Vilardi

    76 N.Y.2d 67 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 343 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Comparing the state law standard — whether there was a "reasonable possibility" that withheld evidence could have affected the result of the proceeding — to the federal standard of "reasonable probability"

  4. A E Supply v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

    479 U.S. 1091 (1987)   Cited 107 times
    Holding that the Act does "create contractually enforceable duties" which "does not conflict with a determination that the statute creates no private right of action, for contractual interpretation and statutory construction are separate enterprises"

  5. Kingsbrook v. Allstate

    61 A.D.3d 13 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 160 times
    Stating that "[j]udicial notice has never been strictly limited to the constitutions, resolutions, ordinances, and regulations of government, but has been applied by case law to other public documents that are generated in a manner which assures their reliability," including "material derived from official government Web sites . . ."

  6. Morris v. City of Hobart

    514 U.S. 1109 (1995)   Cited 67 times
    Recognizing that federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and only may adjudicate claims that the Constitution or Congress have given them authority to hear and determine

  7. Matter of Albano v. Kirby

    36 N.Y.2d 526 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 233 times

    Argued March 19, 1975 Decided May 7, 1975 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOSEPH LIFF, J. Frederick Fagelson for appellant. George W. Percy, Jr., County Attorney (Patrick A. Sweeney of counsel), for respondents. COOKE, J. We review here the discharge of a social services investigator at the end of his 16th week of service, following his appointment from a competitive civil service list for a probationary term of 26 weeks, under county civil

  8. People v. P.J. Video

    68 N.Y.2d 296 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declining to follow New York v. P. J. Video, Inc., 475 U.S. 868

  9. Seawall Associates v. City of New York

    74 N.Y.2d 92 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 90 times
    Finding that development rights are "valuable components of the bundle of rights' making up" a fee interest in real property

  10. Manocherian v. Lenox Hosp

    84 N.Y.2d 385 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 72 times
    Considering regulatory taking claim under New York's Constitution

  11. Section 919.4 - Alteration/closure of existing private rail crossings

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 17 § 919.4   Cited 1 times

    The commissioner may require alteration or closure of any existing private rail crossing, including farm crossings, located in an intercity rail passenger service corridor. The department may participate in the costs of such alteration or closure without a hearing. Such alteration or closure as reflected by plans, specifications and other documents deemed necessary by the commissioner must be submitted for review and written approval of the commissioner before such alteration or closure can be made