34 Cited authorities

  1. Mountain View Coach v. Storms

    102 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 373 times
    Holding that plaintiff who did not hire a substitute bus but rather used one of its reserves could still recover for loss of use
  2. Williams v. Williams

    23 N.Y.2d 592 (N.Y. 1969)   Cited 329 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff's claim that an action was brought against him solely for the purpose of ruining his business reputation was insufficient to establish abuse of process
  3. People v. Santi

    3 N.Y.3d 234 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 118 times

    122. Argued September 9, 2004. Decided October 21, 2004. Appeal, in the first above-entitled action, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered September 8, 2003. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Laura D. Blackburne, J.), which had convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of unauthorized practice of medicine (four counts). APPEAL

  4. Long v. State

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5231 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 93 times
    In Long (supra at 274), the Court of Appeals explained that Ivey v State of New York (80 NY2d 474 [1992]) addressed the third scenario in the preceding paragraph and, in particular, whether a reversal must be predicated on one of the enumerated grounds when a new trial was ordered by the Court as was done in People v Ivey (83 AD2d 788 [4th Dept 1981]) and an acquittal follows upon retrial.
  5. Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho Lam

    51 N.Y.2d 786 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 178 times
    In Chinatown Apartments, a question arose whether the tenant's "structure" violated the lease's prohibition against building a "partition."
  6. Eli Haddad Corp. v. Cal Redmond Studio

    102 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 64 times

    June 14, 1984 Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Edwards, J.), entered January 24, 1984, inter alia, (1) denying plaintiff's motion for multiple relief, granting summary judgment, dismissing defendants' affirmative defenses and requiring payment of use and occupancy pending the outcome of the action and (2) granting defendants' motion for a stay of the action pending determination by the New York City Office of Loft Enforcement on the issue of whether the tenancy is protected by article

  7. Matter of Gold v. Lomenzo

    280 N.E.2d 640 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 86 times
    In Matter of Gold v Lomenzo (29 N.Y.2d 468) we held the Secretary of State has "inherent" authority to impose conditions on the reinstatement of a broker's license — including the payment of restitution (id., at 479).
  8. Kanti-Savita v. Santiago

    18 Misc. 3d 74 (N.Y. Misc. 2007)   Cited 22 times

    No. 2007-220 RI C. December 13, 2007. APPEAL from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Marina Mundy, J.), entered December 15, 2006. The order granted respondents' motion to dismiss in a nonpayment summary proceeding. Maletira B. Thimmaiah, Staten Island, for appellant. Legal Aid Society, Staten Island ( Christopher Lamb of counsel), for respondents. Before: WESTON PATTERSON, J.P., GOLIA and BELEN, JJ. OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM. Order reversed without costs

  9. Matter of Davis v. Dinkins

    206 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)   Cited 35 times
    In Dinkins, the Court held that a similar agreement between the City and a hotel in Queens, which agreed to house up to 150 homeless families, was not a lease for the purposes of Uniform Land Use Review Procedure and for a “fair-share” hearing (id. at 366–367, 613 N.Y.S.2d 933).
  10. Women's Interart Ctr., Inc. v. N.Y.C. Econ. Dev. Corp.

    97 A.D.3d 17 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 13 times

    2012-05-17 WOMEN'S INTERART CENTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (EDC), et al., Defendants. Women's Interart Center, Inc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Clinton Housing Development Fund Corp., Defendant–Appellant, City of New York, Intervenor–Appellant. Rappaport Hertz Cherson & Rosenthal, P.C., Forest Hills (Jeffrey M. Steinitz, Howard Levine and Milan Dey–Chao of counsel), for Clinton Housing Development Fund Corp., appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel

  11. Section 2520.6 - Definitions

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 2520.6   Cited 167 times

    (a) Housing accommodation. That part of any building or structure, occupied or intended to be occupied by one or more individuals as a residence, home, dwelling unit or apartment, and all services, privileges, furnishings, furniture and facilities supplied in connection with the occupation thereof. The term housing accommodation will also apply to any plot or parcel of land which had been regulated pursuant to the City of Rent Law prior to July 1, 1971, and which became subject to the RSL after June

  12. Section 2520.11 - Applicability

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 2520.11   Cited 103 times
    Providing that cooperatives are exempt from regulation under the RSL “so long as they maintain [cooperative] status”
  13. Section 2524.1 - Restrictions on removal of tenant

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 2524.1   Cited 15 times

    (a) As long as the tenant continues to pay the rent to which the owner is entitled, no tenant shall be denied a renewal lease or be removed from any housing accommodation by action to evict or to recover possession, by exclusion from possession, or otherwise, nor shall any person attempt such removal or exclusion from possession, except on one or more of the grounds specified in this Code. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to remove or attempt to remove any tenant from any housing accommodation