§Why CasetextPricing

Branic International Realty Corp., Appellant,v.Phillip Pitt,, Respondent, et al., Respondents.

Brief

34 Cited authorities

  1. Mountain View Coach v. Storms

    102 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 454 times
    Holding that plaintiff who did not hire a substitute bus but rather used one of its reserves could still recover for loss of use

  2. People v. Santi

    3 N.Y.3d 234 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 159 times
    In People v. Santi, 3 N.Y.3d 234, 243, 785 N.Y.S.2d 405, 818 N.E.2d 1146 (2004), the Court of Appeals reaffirmed the long established policy that, " '[i]n implementing a statute, the courts must of necessity examine the purpose of the statute and determine the intention of the Legislature.' " citing, Willams v. Williams, 23 N.Y.2d 592, 598, 298 N.Y.S.2d 473, 246 N.E.2d 333 (1969).

  3. Williams v. Williams

    23 N.Y.2d 592 (N.Y. 1969)   Cited 380 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff's claim that an action was brought against him solely for the purpose of ruining his business reputation was insufficient to establish abuse of process

  4. Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho Lam

    51 N.Y.2d 786 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 240 times
    In Chinatown Apartments, a question arose whether the tenant's "structure" violated the lease's prohibition against building a "partition."

  5. Long v. State

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5231 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 112 times
    In Long v State of New York, 7 NY3d 269, 276 (2006), the Court of Appeals dismissed an unjust conviction claim because it was verified by counsel, not personally by the claimant, citing subdivision 4 and also quoting the 1984 Report of the Law Revision Commission that a claim "must be personally verified."

  6. Eli Haddad Corp. v. Cal Redmond Studio

    102 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 79 times
    Requiring tenant to pay use and occupancy pending Loft Board determination "accommodates the competing interests of the parties in affording necessary and fair protection to both parties, to the tenant through possession, pending determination of the issue by the Loft Board, and, at the same time, to the landlord by requiring the tenant to pay the landlord for use and occupancy"

  7. Matter of Gold v. Lomenzo

    29 N.Y.2d 468 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 93 times
    In Matter of Gold v Lomenzo (29 N.Y.2d 468) we held the Secretary of State has "inherent" authority to impose conditions on the reinstatement of a broker's license — including the payment of restitution (id., at 479).

  8. Kanti-Savita v. Santiago

    18 Misc. 3d 74 (N.Y. App. Term 2007)   Cited 23 times

    No. 2007-220 RI C. December 13, 2007. APPEAL from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Marina Mundy, J.), entered December 15, 2006. The order granted respondents' motion to dismiss in a nonpayment summary proceeding. Maletira B. Thimmaiah, Staten Island, for appellant. Legal Aid Society, Staten Island ( Christopher Lamb of counsel), for respondents. Before: WESTON PATTERSON, J.P., GOLIA and BELEN, JJ. OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM. Order reversed without costs

  9. Matter of Davis v. Dinkins

    206 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)   Cited 37 times
    In Dinkins, the Court held that a similar agreement between the City and a hotel in Queens, which agreed to house up to 150 homeless families, was not a lease for the purposes of Uniform Land Use Review Procedure and for a “fair-share” hearing (id. at 366–367, 613 N.Y.S.2d 933).

  10. Women's Interart Ctr., Inc. v. N.Y.C. Econ. Dev. Corp.

    97 A.D.3d 17 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 15 times

    2012-05-17 WOMEN'S INTERART CENTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (EDC), et al., Defendants. Women's Interart Center, Inc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Clinton Housing Development Fund Corp., Defendant–Appellant, City of New York, Intervenor–Appellant. Rappaport Hertz Cherson & Rosenthal, P.C., Forest Hills (Jeffrey M. Steinitz, Howard Levine and Milan Dey–Chao of counsel), for Clinton Housing Development Fund Corp., appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel

  11. Section 2520.6 - Definitions

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 2520.6   Cited 191 times

    (a) Housing accommodation. That part of any building or structure, occupied or intended to be occupied by one or more individuals as a residence, home, dwelling unit or apartment, and all services, privileges, furnishings, furniture and facilities supplied in connection with the occupation thereof. The term housing accommodation will also apply to any plot or parcel of land which had been regulated pursuant to the City of Rent Law prior to July 1, 1971, and which became subject to the RSL after June

  12. Section 2520.11 - Applicability

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 2520.11   Cited 114 times
    Providing that cooperatives are exempt from regulation under the RSL “so long as they maintain [cooperative] status”

  13. Section 2524.1 - Restrictions on removal of tenant

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 2524.1   Cited 15 times

    (a) As long as the tenant continues to pay the rent to which the owner is entitled, no tenant shall be denied a renewal lease or be removed from any housing accommodation by action to evict or to recover possession, by exclusion from possession, or otherwise, nor shall any person attempt such removal or exclusion from possession, except on one or more of the grounds specified in this Code. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to remove or attempt to remove any tenant from any housing accommodation