Thompson v. Grumman Corp.
78 N.Y.2d 553 (N.Y. 1991) Cited 521 timesHolding employee to be “special employee” where general employer loaned employee to special employer who “exerted comprehensive control over every facet of his work” notwithstanding fact that general employer provided paychecks and Workers Compensation coverage
Lloyd Corp. v. Henchar, Inc.
80 N.Y.2d 124 (N.Y. 1992) Cited 130 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding loan agreement that violated SBIA regulations enforceable
Ramroop v. Flexo-Craft Printing
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 5777 (N.Y. 2008) Cited 23 times 2 Legal AnalysesNo. 121. Argued June 3, 2008. Decided June 26, 2008. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered June 21, 2007. The Appellate Division affirmed a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, which had ruled that claimant was not entitled to additional workers' compensation benefits pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 15 (3) (v). Matter of Ramroop v Flexo-Craft Print, Inc., 41 AD3d 1055, affirmed
Amoah v. Mallah Mgt.
57 A.D.3d 29 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008) Cited 18 timesHolding that the status of an injured worker as an undocumented worker does not prohibit an award of workers' compensation benefits or recovery for lost earnings in a personal injury action predicated on state labor law
Garcia v. Pepe
42 A.D.3d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007) Cited 8 timesNos. 2006-01859, 2006-07521. July 10, 2007. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Peter Pepe, Jr., and Laurie Pepe appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated January 17, 2006, as denied as premature that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) an order of the same court dated June 21, 2006, as denied that
Hettich v. Hettich
105 N.E.2d 601 (N.Y. 1952) Cited 31 timesArgued January 10, 1952 Decided April 17, 1952 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, BOTEIN, J. Clifton F. Weidlich for appellant. George Trosk for respondent. FROESSEL, J. In an action upon a separation agreement executed on July 1, 1932, whereunder defendant agreed to pay plaintiff on and after February 1, 1933, $75 per month during her lifetime (unless she remarried), she alleges the breach of that agreement by defendant from June 1, 1935, to September 1, 1949. We
Matter of Sackolwitz v. Hamburg Co.
67 N.E.2d 152 (N.Y. 1946) Cited 31 timesIn Sackolwitz v. Charles Hamburg Co., Inc., 295 N.Y. 264 (67 N.E.2d 152), the New York court of appeals had before it a claim for double workmen's compensation benefits by an injured minor who had used his older brother's identification and social security card as evidence of age in seeking employment.
International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Mfg. Corp.
294 N.Y. 295 (N.Y. 1945) Cited 22 timesIn International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Mfg. Corp. (294 N.Y. 295) it was held that a vendor of merchandise could not recover therefor unless it was proved that the sales price was within the Office of Price Administration maximum price.
Matter of Clarke v. Town of Russia
283 N.Y. 272 (N.Y. 1940) Cited 15 timesArgued May 21, 1940 Decided July 24, 1940 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department. Chester J. Winslow for appellants. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent. SEARS, J. Claimant seeks an award under the Workmen's Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67) on behalf of herself and her infant daughter for the death of her husband. The decedent died from an injury which he received while working on a highway for
Section 1324a - Unlawful employment of aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1324a Cited 580 times 44 Legal AnalysesAuthorizing the Attorney General to pursue injunctive relief and criminal sanctions in federal district court