§Why CasetextPricing

Eugene Palladino, Appellant,v.CNY Centro, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Brief

44 Cited authorities

  1. Mine Workers v. Gibbs

    383 U.S. 715 (1966)   Cited 17,746 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that supplemental jurisdiction is a "doctrine of discretion"

  2. Zuckerman v. City of N.Y.

    49 N.Y.2d 557 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 24,782 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Granting summary judgment as the city's arguments were considered speculation and this was "patently inadequate to establish the existence of a factual issue requiring a trial . . ."

  3. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,171 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  4. Steelworkers v. Rawson

    495 U.S. 362 (1990)   Cited 560 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that union could contractually undertake, in collective bargaining agreement, other duties towards member employees in addition to statutorily-imposed duty of fair representation

  5. United States v. Mine Workers

    330 U.S. 258 (1947)   Cited 2,628 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be punished for disobeying a court order even if the court was ultimately determined to lack jurisdiction to issue the order

  6. Humphrey v. Moore

    375 U.S. 335 (1964)   Cited 759 times
    Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others

  7. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 874 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  8. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 958 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  9. United States v. White

    322 U.S. 694 (1944)   Cited 603 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination “is a purely personal one” that “cannot be utilized by or on behalf of any organization, such as a corporation”

  10. Ossining School v. Anderson

    73 N.Y.2d 417 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 347 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in negligent misrepresentation cases, the relationship between the parties must "be one of contract or the bond between them so close as to be the functional equivalent of contractual privity"

  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 485,423 times   688 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation

  12. Section 101 - Issuance of restraining orders and injunctions; limitation; public policy

    29 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 1,295 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Stating that no injunction may issue "except in a strict conformity with the provisions of this chapter"

  13. Section 13 - Action or proceeding against unincorporated association

    N.Y. Gen. Ass'ns Law § 13   Cited 138 times
    Stating that labor organization may be served by serving certain officers or business agent