13 Cited authorities

  1. People v. De Bour

    40 N.Y.2d 210 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 2,262 times   6 Legal Analyses
    In People v. LaPene, 352 N.E.2d 562 (N.Y. 1976), the New York Court of Appeals laid out a sliding scale of justifiable police intrusion, short of probable cause to arrest, which specified three distinct levels of intrusion correlating the allowable intensity of police conduct to the nature and weight of the facts precipitating the intrusion.
  2. People v. Hollman

    79 N.Y.2d 181 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 777 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reasonable suspicion was required before narcotics officers could approach a passenger in a bus terminal and ask for permission to search the person's bag
  3. People v. Bigelow

    66 N.Y.2d 417 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 853 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the "good-faith exception" to the warrant requirement
  4. People v. McRay

    51 N.Y.2d 594 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 493 times
    Recognizing that a glassine envelope is a "'telltale sign of heroin'" and that passing one in a "furtive or evasive" manner provides probable cause to arrest (quoting People v. Alexander, 333 N.E.2d 157, 158 (N.Y. 1975))
  5. People v. Dodt

    61 N.Y.2d 408 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 359 times
    In Dodt, despite the fact that the defendant did not even display a gun when he threatened to shoot his victim, the defendant was found to have abducted his victim by the “threatened use of deadly force.” Id.
  6. People v. Garcia

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8670 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 145 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Garcia, where the Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division's determination that the police lacked the requisite founded suspicion when, upon stopping a vehicle for a mere defective brake light, an officer asked if any of the occupants had a weapon (see People v Garcia, 20 NY3d at 324).
  7. People v. Roque

    99 N.Y.2d 50 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 33 times

    146 Decided November 19, 2002. Appeal, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered April 10, 2001, which affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court (Harold J. Rothwax, J.), rendered in New York County upon a verdict convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree. People v. Roque, 282 A.D.2d 245, affirmed. Malvina Nathanson, for appellant

  8. People v. More

    97 N.Y.2d 209 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding warrantless body cavity search incident to arrest was unreasonable where there was no evidence that the delay necessary to obtain a warrant posed threat to officer safety or destruction of the evidence
  9. People v. Hendricks

    43 A.D.3d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that NYCHA building's “history of drug activity and trespassing” provided “objective, credible reason” for Level 1 inquiry “to determine if defendant was legitimately in the building”
  10. People v. Edwards

    69 N.Y.2d 814 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 45 times

    Argued January 12, 1987 Decided February 19, 1987 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Lawrence N. Martin, Jr., J. Joel A. Brenner for appellant. Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (Diane E. Selker and Anthony Joseph Servino of counsel), for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant's motion to suppress granted, the judgments of conviction vacated and the indictments dismissed. Although probable