60 Cited authorities

Dodd v. United States
545 U.S. 353 (2005) Cited 1,374 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that limitations periods under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act begin on the date the right is recognized, not on the date it is made retroactively applicable
Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
542 U.S. 692 (2004) Cited 1,163 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that no "private cause of action" had been Congressionally authorized, and thus, plaintiff was "not entitled to a remedy"
Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.
137 S. Ct. 1718 (2017) Cited 513 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that "individuals and entities who regularly purchase debts originated by someone else and then seek to collect those debts for their own account" are not debt collectors under the FDCPA even if the purchased debt was already in default
Rodriguez v. United States
480 U.S. 522 (1987) Cited 401 times 4 Legal Analyses
Finding no irreconcilable conflict between a minimum sentence and the "suspension authority" of § 3651
Bell v. United States
462 U.S. 356 (1983) Cited 383 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Federal Bank Robbery Act, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2113, was "not limited to common-law larceny," and rejecting possibility that "Congress wished to limit the scope of the amended Act's coverage, and thus limit its remedial purpose, on the basis of an arcane and artificial distinction more suited to the social conditions of 18th century England than the needs of 20th century America"
People v. Jennings
69 N.Y.2d 103 (N.Y. 1986) Cited 763 times
In Jennings, the president of the insured (Sentry) received a check from Sentry's insurer to cover payments owed to the Sentry's clients as a result of losses incurred when the Sentry's warehouse was robbed.
Dowling v. United States
473 U.S. 207 (1985) Cited 239 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that "a non-disclosure can only serve as a basis for a fraudulent scheme when there exists an independent duty that has been breached by the person so charged," such as a fiduciary or statutory duty
People v. Concepcion
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5110 (N.Y. 2011) Cited 224 times
Noting that New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 470.15 bars the Appellate Division "from affirming a judgment, sentence or order on a ground not decided adversely to the appellant by the trial court"
Thyroff v. Nationwide
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2442 (N.Y. 2007) Cited 190 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that computer files could be the subject of a conversion claim, where plaintiff was entirely denied use of those files
Kremen v. Cohen
337 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 192 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that California law permits an action for conversion of an internet domain name
Section 101 - Definitions
17 U.S.C. § 101 Cited 6,315 times 174 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the United States' adherence to provisions of the Berne Convention of 1886
Section 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
18 U.S.C. § 1030 Cited 3,216 times 408 Legal Analyses
Holding cellular phones are protected
Section 2314 - Transportation of stolen goods, securities, moneys, fraudulent State tax stamps, or articles used in counterfeiting
18 U.S.C. § 2314 Cited 3,062 times 22 Legal Analyses
Criminalizing the transportation, transmission, or transfer of goods "in interstate or foreign commerce"
Section 1831 - Economic espionage
18 U.S.C. § 1831 Cited 315 times 85 Legal Analyses
Holding liable for economic espionage "[w]hoever, intending or knowing that the offense will benefit any foreign government ... knowingly ... without authorization appropriates, takes, carries away, or conceals" trade secrets
Section 53a-119 - Larceny defined
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-119 Cited 100 times
Defining embezzlement as occurring when one "wrongfully appropriates to himself or to another property of another in his care or custody"

The People, Respondent,v.Sergey Aleynikov, Appellant.

60 Cited authorities

Holding that limitations periods under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act begin on the date the right is recognized, not on the date it is made retroactively applicable

Holding that no "private cause of action" had been Congressionally authorized, and thus, plaintiff was "not entitled to a remedy"

Holding that "individuals and entities who regularly purchase debts originated by someone else and then seek to collect those debts for their own account" are not debt collectors under the FDCPA even if the purchased debt was already in default

Finding no irreconcilable conflict between a minimum sentence and the "suspension authority" of § 3651

In Jennings, the president of the insured (Sentry) received a check from Sentry's insurer to cover payments owed to the Sentry's clients as a result of losses incurred when the Sentry's warehouse was robbed.

Holding that "a non-disclosure can only serve as a basis for a fraudulent scheme when there exists an independent duty that has been breached by the person so charged," such as a fiduciary or statutory duty

Noting that New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 470.15 bars the Appellate Division "from affirming a judgment, sentence or order on a ground not decided adversely to the appellant by the trial court"

Holding that computer files could be the subject of a conversion claim, where plaintiff was entirely denied use of those files

Holding that California law permits an action for conversion of an internet domain name

Recognizing the United States' adherence to provisions of the Berne Convention of 1886

Holding cellular phones are protected

Criminalizing the transportation, transmission, or transfer of goods "in interstate or foreign commerce"

Holding liable for economic espionage "[w]hoever, intending or knowing that the offense will benefit any foreign government ... knowingly ... without authorization appropriates, takes, carries away, or conceals" trade secrets

Defining embezzlement as occurring when one "wrongfully appropriates to himself or to another property of another in his care or custody"