87 Cited authorities

Crawford v. Washington
541 U.S. 36 (2004) Cited 17,381 times 82 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"
Illinois v. Gates
462 U.S. 213 (1983) Cited 18,905 times 28 Legal Analyses
Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"
Whren v. United States
517 U.S. 806 (1996) Cited 8,585 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that, upon observing traffic violation, officer may stop vehicle regardless of his subjective motivations, "as long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action"
Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (1986) Cited 15,224 times 61 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes
Miller-El v. Dretke
545 U.S. 231 (2005) Cited 2,695 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that a prosecutor “would have cleared up any misunderstanding by asking further questions” if he truly considered a race-neutral characteristic grounds for a peremptory strike
Hernandez v. New York
500 U.S. 352 (1991) Cited 3,861 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that evaluation of a prosecutor's credibility "lies `peculiarly within a trial judge's province'"
Michigan v. Bryant
562 U.S. 344 (2011) Cited 1,577 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that statements made to police concerning an ongoing emergency are not testimonial
United States v. Knights
534 U.S. 112 (2001) Cited 1,804 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a "warrantless search . . ., supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation, was reasonable . . . [under] the Fourth Amendment"
United States v. Ross
456 U.S. 798 (1982) Cited 4,136 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that search under the automobile exception extends only to areas "that may conceal the object of the search"
Snyder v. Louisiana
552 U.S. 472 (2008) Cited 1,363 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that District Court determinations as to discriminatory intent are findings of fact reviewed only for clear error

The People, Respondent,v.Everett B. McMillan, Appellant.

87 Cited authorities

Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"

Holding that a warrant may issue only when probable cause exists under the "totality-of-the-circumstances"

Holding that, upon observing traffic violation, officer may stop vehicle regardless of his subjective motivations, "as long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action"

Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes

Holding that a prosecutor “would have cleared up any misunderstanding by asking further questions” if he truly considered a race-neutral characteristic grounds for a peremptory strike

Holding that evaluation of a prosecutor's credibility "lies `peculiarly within a trial judge's province'"

Holding that statements made to police concerning an ongoing emergency are not testimonial

Holding that a "warrantless search . . ., supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation, was reasonable . . . [under] the Fourth Amendment"

Holding that search under the automobile exception extends only to areas "that may conceal the object of the search"

Holding that District Court determinations as to discriminatory intent are findings of fact reviewed only for clear error