§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of H. Kenneth Ranftle,, Deceased. <br />---------------------------------<br /> Ronald J. Ranftle, Appellant, J. Craig Leiby, Respondent.

Brief

21 Cited authorities

  1. Gletzer v. Harris

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3763 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that a renewal judgment initiated by a judgment creditor after the initial judgment lien had lapsed was effective only from the date of the renewal judgment, and not nunc pro tunc from the date the initial judgment lien lapsed

  2. Matter of Walker

    64 N.Y.2d 354 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 69 times
    Discussing the importance of the public policy behind the sealing of adoption records

  3. Gletzer v. Harris

    51 A.D.3d 196 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 18 times

    March 13, 2008. APPEAL from orders of the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered February 15, 2005 and June 26, 2007. The order entered February 15, 2005 confirmed a referee's report on personal jurisdiction and granted plaintiff Morris I. Geltzer's motion for summary judgment renewing his 1991 judgment lien against defendant Amos Harris as of October 23, 2001. The order entered June 26, 2007 denied an application by petitioners Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. and Copplestone

  4. In re Kenneth Ranftle

    81 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 7 times

    No. 4214. February 24, 2011. Order, Surrogate's Court, New York County (Kristen Booth Glen, S.), entered on or about July 27, 2010, which denied appellant's petition to vacate the probate of his brother's will, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Alexander M. Dudelson, Brooklyn, for appellant. Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., New York (Susan L. Sommer of counsel), for respondent. Kramer Levin Naftalis Frankel LLP, New York (Eve Preminger of counsel), for The New York City Bar Association

  5. Matter of Urdang

    194 A.D.2d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 23 times   2 Legal Analyses

    June 7, 1993 Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Kings County (Bloom, S.). Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally. The decedent Sonia Urdang, also known as Sonia Kaufman, was born in Odessa, Russia in 1898. In or about 1911, she emigrated to the United States and settled in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Upon her marriage to the late Joseph Kaufman, she moved to 273 Beaumont Street in Manhattan Beach, Brooklyn. She lived at that address until 1989, when a series

  6. Dickinson v. Dickinson Bates

    273 A.D.2d 89 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)   Cited 13 times

    June 13, 2000. Decree, Surrogate's Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, S.), entered on or about September 7, 1999, which, in a proceeding to reform certain trust agreements, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Helen Gavaris, for petitioner-appellant. Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Buckley, JJ. The principal of the subject trusts is distributable to the issue of the settlor's son surviving at the time

  7. Matter of Newcomb

    192 N.Y. 238 (N.Y. 1908)   Cited 297 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that a person may have only one domicile

  8. In re Dobbs

    23 Misc. 3d 1105 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 2009)   Cited 1 times

    April 7, 2009. Holzman, J. Courts — Surrogate's Court — Filing of Original Wills Found in Files of Deceased Attorney. Surrogate's Court Procedure Act — § 2402 (9) (Fees; amount of; for filing).

  9. Matter of Gadway

    123 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)   Cited 19 times

    January 8, 1987 Appeal from the Essex County Surrogate's Court, Charles P. Garvey, S. Frederick S. Dennin, appellant pro se. John L. Stinziano for respondents. HARVEY, J. Frances K. Gadway (hereinafter decedent) died testate in Flordia on January 17, 1985. At the time of her death, she had assets in both Florida and New York. Her will had been drafted and executed in this State under the direction of petitioner, her New York attorney. The will bequeathed 50% of the estate to respondents Catherine

  10. Matter of Kartiganer v. Koenig

    194 A.D.2d 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 9 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Describing intent relative to domicile as "whether the place of habitation is the permanent home of a person, with the range of sentiment, feeling and permanent association with it."

  11. Section 500.11 - Alternative procedure for selected appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.11   Cited 536 times

    (a) On its own motion, the court may review selected appeals by an alternative procedure. Such appeals shall be determined on the intermediate appellate court record or appendix and briefs, the writings in the courts below and additional letter submissions on the merits. The clerk of the court shall notify all parties by letter when an appeal has been selected for review pursuant to this section. Appellant may request such review in its preliminary appeal statement. Respondent may request such review