§Why CasetextPricing

Henry T. Lau, Appellant,v.Margaret E. Pescatore Parking, Inc. et al., Respondents.

Brief

13 Cited authorities

  1. Schneider v. Kings Highway Hospital Center

    67 N.Y.2d 743 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 351 times
    Finding plaintiff established prima facie case through evidence that it was more likely that hospital worker rather than plaintiff lowered guardrails on hospital bed

  2. Healy v. ARP Cable, Inc.

    299 A.D.2d 152 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)   Cited 35 times
    In Healy (299 AD2d 152, supra), the circumstantial evidence was also sufficient to create an issue of fact as to whether the defendant created a dangerous condition by mopping.

  3. Mertsaris v. 73rd Corp.

    105 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 61 times

    December 17, 1984 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County, Joseph S. Levine, J. Morris, Duffy, Ivone Jensen ( Patricia D'Alvia, Michael T. Ivone and Andrea M. Alonso of counsel), for 73rd Corp., appellant. Martin, Clearwater Bell ( Neill T. DeTolla and John L.A. Lyddane of counsel), for Francis S. DiFabio, appellant. Deffina, Blau LoPresti, P.C. ( Steven Bennett Blau of counsel), for Nicholas B. Arabos, appellant, and Emmanuel Vernadakis, defendant. Schneider, Kleinick Weitz, P.C. ( Harvey Weitz

  4. Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of Buffalo

    278 N.Y. 1 (N.Y. 1938)   Cited 220 times
    Reversing dismissal because "the natural and reasonable inference" is that the defective stairway caused the fall rather than a heart attack or dizziness

  5. DiVetri v. ABM Janitorial Service, Inc.

    119 A.D.3d 486 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 12 times

    2014-07-24 Anna DiVETRI, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICE, INC., et al., Defendants–Appellants. Gallo Vitucci Klar, LLP, New York (Kimberly A. Ricciardi of counsel), for appellants. Eaton & Torrenzano, LLP, Brooklyn (Jay Torrenzano of counsel), for respondent. FRIEDMAN Gallo Vitucci Klar, LLP, New York (Kimberly A. Ricciardi of counsel), for appellants. Eaton & Torrenzano, LLP, Brooklyn (Jay Torrenzano of counsel), for respondent. FRIEDMAN, J.P., ACOSTA, SAXE, FEINMAN, GISCHE, JJ.

  6. Brito v. Manhattan Bronx Surface

    188 A.D.2d 253 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)   Cited 34 times
    In Brito v New York City Transit Auth. (188 AD2d 253 [1st Dept 1992], appeal dismissed 81 NY2d 993 [1993]), the court held that although section 30(a) of New York City's Traffic Rules and Regulations provides in part that vehicular traffic shall yield the right of way to pedestrians who are lawfully within the intersection, unless the pedestrian could prove that he/she was in a crosswalk before a bus started to rum, the pedestrian would not be entitled to the right of way.

  7. Crawford v. Marcello

    247 A.D.2d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 24 times
    In Crawford v. Marcello, 247 A.D.2d 907 (4th Dep't 1998), the Appellate Division reversed a jury verdict for the plaintiff and directed a new trial, finding the $10,000.00 award for past pain and suffering inadequate, and the failure to award any damages for future pain and suffering not sustainable on any fair interpretation of the evidence, where the plaintiff had in a trip-and-fall sustained an nondisplaced metatarsal fracture of the left foot, a sprained ankle, and a fracture to her elbow requiring internal fixation and resulting in a reduction in range of motion and alleged continuing pain.

  8. Lau v. Margaret E. Pescatore Parking, Inc.

    145 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

    12-15-2016 Henry T. LAU, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MARGARET E. PESCATORE PARKING, INC., et al., Defendants–Respondents. Kenneth J. Gorman, Esq., P.C., New York (Kenneth J. Gorman of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of James J. Toomey, New York (Eric P. Tosca of counsel), for Margaret E. Pescatore Parking, Inc., respondent. Debra J. Millman, P.C., New York (Norman Landres of counsel), for Tai Ming Development Corp., respondent. Kenneth J. Gorman, Esq., P.C., New York (Kenneth J. Gorman of counsel)

  9. Palumbo v. Innovative Comm. Concepts Inc.

    251 A.D.2d 246 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 14 times

    June 25, 1998 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.). An issue of fact exists as to the employer's supervisory responsibility for the telephone installation work, raised by deposition testimony that it was customary for the work to be inspected upon completion and that the employer had paid for the work without complaint. Also, upon the present record, including the evidence that the employer's specifications called for long wires allowing for the movement of telephones

  10. Bassat v. Alpha Iron Works, Inc.

    75 A.D.3d 1062 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

    No. CA 09-02410. July 2, 2010. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David Michael Barry, J.), entered July 7, 2009 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of the motion of defendants Alpha Iron Works, Inc. and Alpha Iron Works, LLC for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action, for negligence, against them insofar as that cause of action alleges that those defendants created the allegedly dangerous condition. THOMAS R. MONKS

  11. Section 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review