§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Diane Mendez, Respondent,v.New York City Department of Education, et al., Appellants.

Brief

27 Cited authorities

  1. Pell v. Board of Education

    34 N.Y.2d 222 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 5,551 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the standard of review in an Article 78 appeal

  2. Matter of Arrocha v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of N.Y

    93 N.Y.2d 361 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 170 times
    Upholding denial of teaching license based on prior felony drug conviction notwithstanding applicant's possession of certificate of relief from disabilities

  3. Matter of Mid-State Mgmt. v. New York City

    112 A.D.2d 72 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)   Cited 181 times

    July 11, 1985 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard W. Wallach, J.). This proceeding arises out of the closing of a swimming pool located on the premises or adjacent to the petitioner's building at 2750 Homecrest Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, managed by Mid-State Management Corp. (Mid-State). New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (Division), which assumed the responsibilities of the CAB effective April 1, 1984, pursuant to Laws of 1983 (ch 403), appeals from a judgment

  4. Matter of Johnson v. Katz

    68 N.Y.2d 649 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 173 times

    Decided June 10, 1986 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Lawrence E. Kahn, J. William F. Sheehan for appellant. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (William J. Kogan, Robert Hermann and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Judicial review of the determination to discharge this probationary employee is limited to an inquiry as to whether the termination was made

  5. Olsson v. Bd. of Higher Educ

    49 N.Y.2d 408 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 178 times
    Recognizing judicial reluctance to intervene in controversies involving academic standards

  6. Mid-State Management Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    66 N.Y.2d 1032 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 138 times

    Decided December 26, 1985 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Richard W. Wallach, J. William E. Rosen for appellant. Edward Chazin and Iris J. Korman for respondent. On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 112 A.D.2d 72). Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS

  7. Austin v. Board of Education, the City

    280 A.D.2d 365 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 77 times

    February 16, 2001. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered June 4, 199 9, which granted the petition pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a(5) and CPLR § 7511 to vacate the determination of the hearing officer of guilt of Charge III, specification N of the disciplinary charges brought against petitioner, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, respondents' cross-motion to dismiss the petition granted and the determination reinstated. Conrad

  8. Matter Frasier v. Board Educ

    71 N.Y.2d 763 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 100 times
    Noting local board's discretion in selecting probationary teachers and evaluating them for appointment

  9. Matter of Murane v. Department of Educ

    82 A.D.3d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 38 times

    No. 4566. March 22, 2011. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered December 31, 2009, which denied the petition seeking to, among other things, annul respondent's determination terminating petitioner's employment as a probationary teacher and to direct respondent to expunge petitioner's year-end unsatisfactory rating (U-rating) and reinstate her employment, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed

  10. Duncan v. Kelly

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 181 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 39 times

    No. 47 SSM 36. Decided January 15, 2008. APPEAL, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, from an order of that Court, entered August 9, 2007. The Appellate Division affirmed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, which had dismissed a petition to annul respondents' determination terminating petitioner's employment as a probationary police officer

  11. Section 600.10 - Format and content of records, appendices and briefs

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 600.10   Cited 11 times

    (a) Form and size. (1) Generally; paper and page size. Records, appendices and briefs shall be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black on white copy and shall be on a good grade of white, opaque, unglazed recycled paper that satisfies the requirements of subdivision (e) of this section. Paper shall measure vertically 11 inches on the bound edge and horizontally 81/2 inches. The clerk may refuse to accept for filing a paper which is not legible or otherwise does not comply