5092 April 11, 2002. Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered May 12, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, dismissed the complaint against defendants Peter Coundorous and P.C.S.B. prior to trial and against defendants 229 Columbus Avenue Associates and Buchbinder Warren following trial upon a jury verdict, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the complaint reinstated to the extent it asserts causes of action for liability under Labor
July 24, 1997 Appeal from the Court of Claims (Christopher Mega, J.). There is no dispute as to the relevant facts here and the questions raised were ripe for determination on summary judgment. We find that the facts clearly show that plaintiff's injury did not fall within the scope of Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6). "[S]ection 240 (1) imposes absolute liability on owners, contractors and their agents for any breach of the statutory duty [to provide adequate safety devices] which has proximately
July 7, 2000. Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Lewis County, Parker, J. — Summary Judgment. PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HAYES, HURLBUTT AND KEHOE, JJ. Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging violations of Labor Law § 241 Lab. (6) and § 200 Lab. and seeking, inter alia, damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff Stephen
2012-09-4 Glenford MORRIS, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. PAVARINI CONSTRUCTION, et al., Defendants–Respondents. Hill & Moin LLP, New York (Cheryl R. Eisberg Moin of counsel), for appellant. London Fischer LLP, New York (David B. Franklin of counsel), for respondents. TOM Hill & Moin LLP, New York (Cheryl R. Eisberg Moin of counsel), for appellant. London Fischer LLP, New York (David B. Franklin of counsel), for respondents. TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, MOSKOWITZ, ACOSTA, JJ. Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County
April 29, 2011. Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John R. Schwartz, A.J.), rendered December 11, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree. Present — Scudder, P.J., Fahey, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: Defendant
August 13, 1959. Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department. Lynton Saslow ( Harold A. Axel, Bernard A. Saslow and Richard Rodwin of counsel), for relators. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Herman Nehlsen and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondent. HERLIHY, J. The relators are the trustees mentioned herein. The relators were appointed trustees of the Hotel Windermere Trust by an order of the Supreme Court, pursuant to section 122-a Real Prop.
(a) General requirements. Forms, shores and reshores shall be structurally safe and shall be properly braced or tied together so as to maintain position and shape. (b) Inspection. Designated persons shall continuously inspect the stability of all forms, shores and reshores including all braces and other supports during the placing of concrete. Any unsafe condition shall be remedied immediately. (c) Beams, floors and roofs. (1) Necessary horizontal and diagonal bracing shall be provided in both longitudinal