§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Thomas P. O'Neill, et al., Appellants-Respondents,v.Ann Pfau,, Respondent-Appellant.

Brief

11 Cited authorities

  1. Quantum Health Resources v. DeBuono

    273 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)   Cited 23 times

    June 29, 2000. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered July 2, 1999 in Albany County, which granted petitioner's application, in a combined proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and action for declaratory judgment, to, inter alia, review a determination of respondents denying petitioner Medicaid reimbursement. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Kathleen M. Treasure of counsel), Albany, for appellants. Iseman, Cunningham, Riester Hyde LLP (Brian M. Culnan of counsel), Albany

  2. Chase v. Board of Educ

    188 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 30 times

    February 11, 1993 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County, William H. Keniry, J. Hogan Sarzynski, Binghamton (John P. Lynch of counsel), for Board of Education of the Roxbury Central School District, appellant. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General, Albany (Kathleen Liston Morrison, Peter H. Schiff and Douglas H. Ward of counsel), for Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, appellant. Jordan Walster, Roxbury (Herbert Jordan of counsel), for respondents. CREW III, J. On August 17, 1987

  3. Secretaries v. Court Admin

    75 N.Y.2d 460 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 25 times

    Argued February 13, 1990 Decided March 27, 1990 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Ira Gammerman, J., Kristin Booth Glen, J. Michael Colodner, John Eiseman and Patricia P. Satterfield for Office of Court Administration and another, appellants-respondents in the first above-entitled matter. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Lillian Z. Cohen, O. Peter Sherwood and Lawrence S. Kahn of counsel), for Classification Review Board, appellant-respondent

  4. Matter of Gavigan v. McCoy

    37 N.Y.2d 548 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 37 times

    Argued September 8, 1975 Decided October 21, 1975 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOSEPH A. BRUST, J. John I. Coster for appellant. Michael Colodner and Michael R. Juviler for respondent. GABRIELLI, J. The principal issue presented is whether the performance by petitioner, while an Assistant Special Deputy Clerk in the Bronx County Court, of the duties of a law assistant, entitled him to be reclassified to the position and title of Law Assistant

  5. Schaal v. City of Utica

    6 A.D.3d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 4 times

    CA 03-01997. Decided April 30, 2004. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (John G. Ringrose, A.J.), entered April 8, 2003. The order granted the motion of defendant City of Utica and the cross motion of defendants 200 Genesee Street, Inc. and Radisson Hotel-Utica Center, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them in a personal injury action. GUSTAVE J. DE TRAGLIA, JR., UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. JOHN W. DILLON, CORPORATION COUNSEL, UTICA (JOSEPH P. GIRUZZI

  6. McKillop v. Lippman

    9 Misc. 3d 635 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2005)   Cited 3 times

    25325. August 4, 2005. Kauff McClain McGuire, LLP, New York City ( Raymond G. McGuire of counsel), for petitioner. Michael Colodner, New York City, for respondent. OPINION OF THE COURT ROSALYN RICHTER, J. On January 8, 2004, the Office of Court Administration (OCA) implemented a major statewide reclassification of its court security title series, which consists of those court employees responsible for providing security and maintaining order within court facilities. Prior to the reclassification

  7. Bellacosa v. Review Bd.

    72 N.Y.2d 383 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 17 times
    In Matter of Bellacosa v Classification Review Bd. (72 N.Y.2d 383, 391, 392, supra), we noted that the authority to adopt and revise classifications and allocations constitutes a "core administrative power" delegated exclusively to the CAJ and that "under the existing regulatory scheme, only the CAJ, or a designated representative over whom the CAJ retains supervisory authority, may exercise that power."

  8. King v. City of Newburgh

    84 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)   Cited 17 times
    In King, the court held that the initial determination of whether an illness was job related (under § 207-a) is to be made by the municipality and may be appealed pursuant to article 78.

  9. Matter of Civil Serv. Emp. v. Clinton County

    169 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)   Cited 7 times

    January 24, 1991 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County (Plumadore, J.). Mikoll, J.Page 971 The primary issue presented on this appeal is whether Supreme Court properly found that a rational basis existed for the determination of respondents not to recommend that Irene Bissonette's title of senior account clerk/typist be reallocated from grade eight to grade 10. The answer is in the affirmative. The judgment of Supreme Court dismissing the petition should therefore be affirmed. As a result

  10. Matter of Camperlengo v. State Liq. Auth

    16 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that a decision after a formal reconsideration on the merits involving a new investigation and consideration of additional testimony was the actual final determination