99 Cited authorities

  1. Jones v. Barnes

    463 U.S. 745 (1983)   Cited 9,943 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was not ineffective assistance for appellate counsel to decline to make every nonfrivolous argument requested by the defendant
  2. Brady v. Maryland

    373 U.S. 83 (1963)   Cited 33,166 times   132 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution"
  3. United States v. Agurs

    427 U.S. 97 (1976)   Cited 6,706 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no Brady violation when nondisclosed evidence is "largely cumulative" of other evidence
  4. Giglio v. United States

    405 U.S. 150 (1972)   Cited 8,449 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that impeachment evidence falls within the Brady rule
  5. Holmes v. South Carolina

    547 U.S. 319 (2006)   Cited 1,498 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional a state evidentiary rule automatically excluding alternative perpetrator evidence when the prosecution case was strong
  6. Chambers v. Mississippi

    410 U.S. 284 (1973)   Cited 5,272 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Mississippi voucher and hearsay rules were unconstitutional as applied to the extent that they prevented the defendant from: putting on evidence of a third party's confession to the crime with which the defendant was charged and challenging that witness's subsequent retraction
  7. United States v. Scheffer

    523 U.S. 303 (1998)   Cited 1,683 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant was able to present his defense when the defendant was prevented from using evidence that would have bolstered his credibility
  8. Crane v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 683 (1986)   Cited 2,682 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an opportunity to present a complete defense "would be an empty one if the State were permitted to exclude competent, reliable evidence bearing on the credibility of a confession when such evidence is central to the defendant's claim of innocence"
  9. People v. Contes

    60 N.Y.2d 620 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 10,895 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating the standard for review of the legal sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case is whether "after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"
  10. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California

    464 U.S. 501 (1984)   Cited 1,483 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that media have a right of access to voir dire
  11. Section 520.11 - Admission pro hac vice

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 520.11   Cited 49 times
    Permitting member of bar of another state to be admitted pro hac vice provided that, inter alia, attorney is associated with member in good standing of New York bar “who shall be the attorney of record in the matter”