99 Cited authorities

  1. Jones v. Barnes

    463 U.S. 745 (1983)   Cited 10,058 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was not ineffective assistance for appellate counsel to decline to make every nonfrivolous argument requested by the defendant
  2. Brady v. Maryland

    373 U.S. 83 (1963)   Cited 33,118 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution"
  3. United States v. Agurs

    427 U.S. 97 (1976)   Cited 6,681 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no Brady violation when nondisclosed evidence is "largely cumulative" of other evidence
  4. Giglio v. United States

    405 U.S. 150 (1972)   Cited 8,358 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that impeachment evidence falls within the Brady rule
  5. Holmes v. South Carolina

    547 U.S. 319 (2006)   Cited 1,482 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional a state evidentiary rule automatically excluding alternative perpetrator evidence when the prosecution case was strong
  6. Chambers v. Mississippi

    410 U.S. 284 (1973)   Cited 5,251 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Mississippi voucher and hearsay rules were unconstitutional as applied to the extent that they prevented the defendant from: putting on evidence of a third party's confession to the crime with which the defendant was charged and challenging that witness's subsequent retraction
  7. United States v. Scheffer

    523 U.S. 303 (1998)   Cited 1,666 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant was able to present his defense when the defendant was prevented from using evidence that would have bolstered his credibility
  8. Crane v. Kentucky

    476 U.S. 683 (1986)   Cited 2,649 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the state court's exclusion of evidence probative of the credibility of the defendant's confession because the proffered evidence was relevant to voluntariness, an issue the court had already ruled on, violated the defendant's right to a fair trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments
  9. People v. Contes

    60 N.Y.2d 620 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 11,173 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating the standard for review of the legal sufficiency of evidence in a criminal case is whether "after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt"
  10. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California

    464 U.S. 501 (1984)   Cited 1,480 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that media have a right of access to voir dire
  11. Section 520.11 - Admission pro hac vice

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 520.11   Cited 49 times
    Permitting member of bar of another state to be admitted pro hac vice provided that, inter alia, attorney is associated with member in good standing of New York bar “who shall be the attorney of record in the matter”