§Why CasetextPricing

Heller et al v. Logan Acquisitions Corporation

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION for summary judgment Final Summary Judgment and Supporting Memorandum of Law

2 Cited authorities

  1. Quigg v. Thomas Cnty. Sch. Dist.

    814 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2016)   Cited 277 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that remarks based on sex stereotypes constituted circumstantial evidence of sex discrimination sufficient to overcome summary judgment where the remarks were made "during conversations about" the employment decision; "in relative temporal proximity to" the decision; and "specifically refer[ed] to" the company's preferences

  2. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,115 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit