8 Cited authorities

  1. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.

    572 U.S. 898 (2014)   Cited 1,326 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claims are not indefinite if, "viewed in light of the specification and prosecution history, [they] inform those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention with reasonable certainty"
  2. Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC

    792 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2015)   Cited 606 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a means-plus-function term is indefinite "if a person of ordinary skill in the art would be unable to recognize the structure in the specification and associate it with the corresponding function in the claim"
  3. Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc.

    766 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2014)   Cited 413 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding terms of degree are not inherently indefinite as long as claim language provides enough certainty to one of skill in art when read in context of invention
  4. Exxon Chemical Patents v. Lubrizol Corp.

    64 F.3d 1553 (Fed. Cir. 1995)   Cited 259 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the claimed composition exists at the moment that each of the claimed ingredients are present in the amounts specifically claimed
  5. One-E-Way, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

    859 F.3d 1059 (Fed. Cir. 2017)   Cited 40 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In One-E-Way, which involved a patent for a wireless digital audio system, the defendant argued that the term “virtually free from interference” was indefinite.
  6. Wi-Lan USA, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

    830 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2016)   Cited 35 times
    Noting the "presumption that differently worded claims cover different claim scope," stemming from "the legal canon of construction against superfluity" such that " construction that would cause two differently worded claims to cover exactly the same claim scope would render one of the claims superfluous, so [courts] apply a presumption against such constructions"
  7. PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLC

    815 F.3d 734 (Fed. Cir. 2016)   Cited 27 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Stating that a nexus may exist "even when the product has additional, unclaimed features"
  8. M-I LLC v. Fpusa, LLC

    No. SA:15-CV-406-DAE (W.D. Tex. Oct. 17, 2016)

    No. SA:15-CV-406-DAE 10-17-2016 M-I LLC, Plaintiff, v. FPUSA, LLC, Defendant. David Alan Ezra Senior United States Distict Judge ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISSOLVE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Before the Court is a Motion to Dissolve the Preliminary Injunction issued by this Court on November 4, 2015, filed by Defendant FPUSA, LLC ("Defendant") (Dkt. # 113). On October 13, 2016, the Court held a hearing on the matter. Ted. D. Lee, Esq., Michelle C. Replogle, Esq., and John R. Keville, Esq., appeared