10 Cited authorities

  1. Pell v. Board of Education

    34 N.Y.2d 222 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 5,548 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the standard of review in an Article 78 appeal
  2. Peckham v. Calogero

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3585 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 513 times
    In Peckham v Calogero (12 NY3d 424 [2009]) the Court of Appeals upheld the determination of the State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), which granted a landlord's application to refuse renewal of its tenant's lease.
  3. Albany Law Sch. v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3227 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 103 times

    No. 65 04-26-2012 In the Matter of Albany Law School et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities et al., Appellants-Respondents. Victor Paladino, for appellants-respondents. Jennifer J. Monthie, for respondents-appellants. NYSARC, Inc.; National Disability Rights Network et al., amici curiae. GRAFFEO Victor Paladino, for appellants-respondents. Jennifer J. Monthie, for respondents-appellants. NYSARC, Inc.; National Disability Rights

  4. Yaniveth R. ex rel. Ramona S. v. LTD Realty Co.

    2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2550 (N.Y. 2016)   Cited 66 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 35 04-05-2016 YANIVETH R., an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, RAMONA S., et al., Appellants, v. LTD REALTY CO. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (And a Third–Party Action.). Levy Konigsberg, LLP, New York City (Alan J. Konigsberg and Brendan E. Little of counsel), for appellants. Furey, Furey, Leverage, Manzione, Williams & Darlington, P.C., Hempstead (Susan Weihs Darlington and Josephine DeLuca of counsel), for respondents. McGaw, Alventosa & Zajac, Jericho (Andrew Zajac and

  5. Frank v. Meadowlakes Development Corp.

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2410 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Frank, we held that CPLR article 16 limited the amount that can be recovered in indemnity when a tortfeasor's liability is 50% or less.
  6. Matter of Steinbeck v. Gerosa

    4 N.Y.2d 302 (N.Y. 1958)   Cited 214 times
    Holding that, although sharing profits is an element of a joint venture, "[a]n agreement to distribute the proceeds of an enterprise upon a percentage basis does not give rise to a joint venture if the enterprise does not represent a joinder of property, skills and risks"
  7. Matter of Galvani v. Nassau County Police

    242 A.D.2d 64 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 26 times
    In Galvani, the Appellate Division held that an injured party who was awarded damages in a civil rights action against a Nassau County police officer did not have standing to challenge the decision by the Nassau County Police Indemnification Board not to indemnify that officer.
  8. Sagal-Cotler v. Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of N.Y.

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2775 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 73 74. 2013-04-25 In the Matter of Deborah SAGAL–COTLER, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF The CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Josephine Thomas, Appellant, v. New York City Department of Education et al., Respondents. Office of General Counsel, New York State United Teachers, New York City (Ariana A. Gambella and Richard E. Casagrande of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled action. Lichten & Bright, PC, New York City (Stuart

  9. DiLeonardo v. Nassau Cnty. Police Officer Indemnification Bd.

    148 A.D.3d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)   Cited 2 times

    03-01-2017 In the Matter of Anthony D. DiLEONARDO, etc., appellant, v. NASSAU COUNTY POLICE OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION BOARD, et al., respondents. Barket Marion Epstein & Kearon, LLP, Garden City, NY (Donna Aldea of counsel), for appellant. Ryan, Brennan & Donnelly, LLP, Floral Park, NY (John M. Donnelly of counsel), for respondents Nassau County Police Officer Indemnification Board, Sheriff Michael S. Sposato, Daniel J. McCloy, and First Deputy Commissioner of Police Thomas J. Krumpter. Bee Ready Fishbein

  10. Matter of Robins v. Blaney

    59 N.Y.2d 393 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 19 times

    Argued June 6, 1983 Decided July 7, 1983 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, EDWARD S. CONWAY, J. Elizabeth A. Truly and James R. Sandner for appellant. Victor M. DeBonis, Robert D. Stone and Kenneth Pawson for Joseph J. Blaney, respondent. Lawrence W. Reich for Board of Education of the Bellmore-Merrick Central High School District, respondent. Per Curiam. The principal issue on this appeal is the proper interpretation of section 2509 (subd 1