§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Alfred Gary, Appellant.

Brief

6 Cited authorities

  1. Jackson v. Virginia

    443 U.S. 307 (1979)   Cited 77,493 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts conducting review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction should view the "evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution"

  2. People v. Gray

    86 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 3,227 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the issue of evidentiary sufficiency must be preserved for appellate review

  3. People v. Vargas

    88 N.Y.2d 363 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 166 times
    Holding that the New York right to be present at sidebars "is not rooted in the Constitution but rather in [section 260.20 of the New York Criminal Procedure Law,] which requires that ` defendant . . . be personally present during the trial of an indictment'"

  4. People v. Lawrence

    64 N.Y.2d 200 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 187 times

    Argued November 20, 1984 Decided December 27, 1984 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Frederic S. Berman, J. Barry Stendig and William E. Hellerstein for appellant. Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney ( Oscar Garcia-Rivera and Robert M. Pitler of counsel), for respondent. SIMONS, J. Defendant has been convicted of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

  5. People v. Gaimari

    176 N.Y. 84 (N.Y. 1903)   Cited 2,127 times

    Argued June 19, 1903 Decided October 6, 1903 Charles E. Le Barbier for appellant. William Travers Jerome, District Attorney ( Robert C. Taylor and Howard S. Gans of counsel), for respondent. VANN, J. At the time of the homicide the defendant lived with his wife in a double tenement house known as No. 56 Roosevelt street, in the city of New York, and Josephine Santa Petro, the deceased, lived with her husband in the same building. The defendant worked in Jersey City, and the deceased was janitress

  6. People v. Siegel

    87 N.Y.2d 536 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 37 times
    In Siegel, the New York Court of Appeals approved of the trial court's decision advise the jury that it could consider a defense witness's of the privilege on his credibility, rather than striking his testimony, since that remedy was not only consistent with a proper concern for the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to call witnesses on his own behalf.