§Why CasetextPricing

Justinian Capital SPC, Appellant,v.WestLB AG,, et al., Respondents.

Brief

18 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Santi

    3 N.Y.3d 234 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 159 times
    In People v. Santi, 3 N.Y.3d 234, 243, 785 N.Y.S.2d 405, 818 N.E.2d 1146 (2004), the Court of Appeals reaffirmed the long established policy that, " '[i]n implementing a statute, the courts must of necessity examine the purpose of the statute and determine the intention of the Legislature.' " citing, Willams v. Williams, 23 N.Y.2d 592, 598, 298 N.Y.S.2d 473, 246 N.E.2d 333 (1969).

  2. Long v. State

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5231 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 112 times
    In Long v State of New York, 7 NY3d 269, 276 (2006), the Court of Appeals dismissed an unjust conviction claim because it was verified by counsel, not personally by the claimant, citing subdivision 4 and also quoting the 1984 Report of the Law Revision Commission that a claim "must be personally verified."

  3. Trust Certificate Holders v. Love Funding Corp.

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7323 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 73 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Plaintiff could not recover as it was assigned a right for the purpose of litigation

  4. Tompkins County Support Coll. v. Chamberlin

    99 N.Y.2d 328 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 52 times
    Construing 42 U.S.C. § 666

  5. Long v. Adirondack Park

    76 N.Y.2d 416 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 69 times
    Rejecting a construction based on the rule of the last antecedent because it ran contrary to the purpose, intent, and overall structure of the statute

  6. Fairchild Hiller v. McDonnell Douglas

    28 N.Y.2d 325 (N.Y. 1971)   Cited 72 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding further discovery not warranted and rejecting champerty defense on motion for summary judgment where undisputed facts established plaintiff did not receive assignment for "sole" and "primary" purpose of bringing action thereon

  7. BSC Associates, LLC v. Leidos, Inc.

    91 F. Supp. 3d 319 (N.D.N.Y. 2015)   Cited 8 times
    Noting that when a "valid assignment is made, the assignee steps into the assignor's shoes and acquires whatever rights the latter had, including the right to enforce the contract"

  8. Justinian Capital SPC v. Westlb AG

    37 Misc. 3d 518 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2012)   Cited 9 times

    2012-08-15 JUSTINIAN CAPITAL SPC, for and on behalf of BLUE HERON SEGREGATED PORTFOLIO, Plaintiff, v. WESTLB AG, New York Branch, WestLB Asset Management (US) LLC, and Brightwater Capital Management LLC, Defendants. Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. for plaintiff. Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP for defendants. SHIRLEY WERNER KORNREICH Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. for plaintiff. Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP for defendants. SHIRLEY WERNER KORNREICH, J. This action arises out of the collapse of two special purpose vehicles

  9. Justinian Capital SPC ex rel. Portfolio v. Westlb AG, N.Y. Branch, Westlb Asset Mgmt. (Us) LLC

    43 Misc. 3d 598 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2014)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses

    2014-02-24 JUSTINIAN CAPITAL SPC, for and on behalf of BLUE HERON SEGREGATED PORTFOLIO, Plaintiff, v. WESTLB AG, New York Branch, WestLB Asset Management (US) LLC, and Brightwater Capital Management LLC, Defendants. Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., for plaintiff. Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, for defendants. SHIRLEY WERNER KORNREICH Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., for plaintiff. Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, for defendants. SHIRLEY WERNER KORNREICH, J. Defendants WestLB AG, New York Branch and WestLB Asset Management

  10. Justinian Capital SPC ex rel. Blue Heron Segregated Portfolio v. WestLB AG

    128 A.D.3d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 3 times

    2015-05-21 JUSTINIAN CAPITAL SPC for and on behalf of BLUE HERON SEGREGATED PORTFOLIO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. WESTLB AG, etc., et al., Defendants–Respondents. Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., New York (James J. Sabella of counsel), for appellant. Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New York (Christopher M. Paparella of counsel), for respondents. MAZZARELLI Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., New York (James J. Sabella of counsel), for appellant. Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New York (Christopher M. Paparella of counsel), for

  11. Section 489 - Purchase of claims by corporations or collection agencies

    N.Y. Jud. Law § 489   Cited 215 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Containing specific requirement of "with the intent and for the purpose" for champerty defense