68 Cited authorities

  1. Garcetti v. Ceballos

    547 U.S. 410 (2006)   Cited 3,295 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Holding if an employee does not speak as a citizen on a matter of public concern, "the employee has no First Amendment cause of action based on his or her employer's reaction to the speech"
  2. Connick v. Myers

    461 U.S. 138 (1983)   Cited 5,203 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Myer’s First Amendment interest did "not require that Connick tolerate action which he reasonably believed would disrupt the office, undermine his authority, and destroy close working relationships"
  3. Grayned v. City of Rockford

    408 U.S. 104 (1972)   Cited 4,270 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute's words, even when "marked by flexibility and reasonable breadth, rather than meticulous specificity," are clear based on "what the ordinance as a whole prohibits"
  4. Perry v. Sindermann

    408 U.S. 593 (1972)   Cited 4,200 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mutually explicit understanding could give rise to protected property interest
  5. Pickering v. Board of Education

    391 U.S. 563 (1968)   Cited 5,082 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding teacher's dismissal for criticizing school board unconstitutional
  6. Perry Ed. Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn

    460 U.S. 37 (1983)   Cited 1,943 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the exclusion of communications from one union to potential members while allowing communications from another was not viewpoint discrimination because there was "no indication that the school board intended to discourage one viewpoint and advance another"
  7. New York v. Ferber

    458 U.S. 747 (1982)   Cited 1,762 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding child pornography is not subject to First Amendment protections
  8. Rankin v. McPherson

    483 U.S. 378 (1987)   Cited 1,431 times
    Holding clerical employee's dismissal for supporting assassination attempt on President unconstitutional
  9. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union

    466 U.S. 485 (1984)   Cited 1,457 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding appellate court must, when evaluating actual malice in libel case, independently determine "whether the evidence in the record . . . is of the convincing clarity required to strip the utterance of First Amendment protection"
  10. Virginia v. Black

    538 U.S. 343 (2003)   Cited 733 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment protects the burning of a 25–foot cross at a Ku Klux Klan rally
  11. s 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review