§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.John Gayden, Appellant.

Brief

5 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Hollman

    79 N.Y.2d 181 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 779 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reasonable suspicion was required before narcotics officers could approach a passenger in a bus terminal and ask for permission to search the person's bag

  2. People v. Berrios

    28 N.Y.2d 361 (N.Y. 1971)   Cited 600 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Argued March 2, 1971 Decided May 12, 1971 Appeal from the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, NEAL P. BOTTIGLIERI, J., WALTER H. GLADWIN, J., NICHOLAS F. DELAGI, J., DENNIS EDWARDS, JR., J., LOUIS SCHRIFIN, J. Appeal from the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts of the Second Judicial Department, ALLEN BELDOCK, J., ALBERT R. MURRAY, J. Donald H. Zuckerman, Milton Adler, William E. Hellerstein, Lewis B. Oliver, Jr., Carol Berkman and William A. Nelson for appellants

  3. People v. Holmes

    81 N.Y.2d 1056 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 199 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that police observation of an "unidentified bulge" in defendant's jacket pocket, in a "known narcotics location," taken together with defendant's flight, justified an information request but not police pursuit

  4. People v. Diaz

    81 N.Y.2d 106 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declining to adopt "plain-feel" exception as extension of "plain-view" exception, and citing other states that at the time had arrived at the same conclusion

  5. People v. William

    98 N.Y.2d 93 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 76 times
    In People v. William II, 98 N.Y.2d 93, 745 N.Y.S.2d 792, 772 N.E.2d 1150 (2002), the police received an anonymous call indicating a man named “Will” had just been involved in a drive-by shooting.