§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Alicia Echevarria, Appellant,v.Matthew M. Wambua,, et al., Respondents.

Brief

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nurse Anesthetists v. Novello

    2 N.Y.3d 207 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 312 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that standing may not be based on "hypothesized harm," and that "[p]laintiff's speculation about the future course the Guidelines might take [i.e., the future injury their application might cause to plaintiff] cannot supply the missing ingredient of in-fact injury."

  2. Boryszewski v. Brydges

    37 N.Y.2d 361 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 186 times
    Rejecting state constitutional challenges to public retirement plan based onholding that retirement benefits are a component of present compensation

  3. Matter of Burke v. Sugarman

    35 N.Y.2d 39 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 51 times
    In Burke, the petitioners alleged that illegal appointments were being made from outside an eligible list, or without regard to ranking on a list (see, id., at 42).

  4. Bradford School v. Ambach

    56 N.Y.2d 158 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 37 times
    In Bradford, we held that a school board's interest and responsibility for determining whether a teacher is properly certified was sufficient to fulfill the "zone of interest" test for standing to challenge the decision of the Commissioner of Education that overruled the school board's determination and awarded certification to a teacher.

  5. Echevarria v. Wambua

    116 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

    2014-04-1 In re Alicia ECHEVARRIA, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Matthew M. WAMBUA, etc., Respondent–Respondent, East Midtown Plaza Housing Company, et al., Respondents–Appellants. Abrams Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP, New York (Andrew W. Gefell of counsel), for East Midtown Plaza Housing Company, appellant. Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., New York (Jeffrey R. Metz of counsel), for Mark Andermanis and Sandra Andermanis, appellants. MAZZARELLI Abrams Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP, New York (Andrew W. Gefell

  6. Jerkens Truck v. Yonkers

    174 A.D.2d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)   Cited 12 times
    Holding an unsuccessful lowest bidder had standing to bring writ of prohibition claim to prevent city from awarding public contract to the successful bidder

  7. Matter of N.Y. St. Ass'n of Comm. v. Shaffer

    119 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)   Cited 9 times

    April 3, 1986 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Conway, J.). Levine, J. A CPLR article 78 proceeding was initiated to challenge the awarding of grants by respondent to local community action program agencies pursuant to the Federal Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. § 9901-9912), commonly called the Community Services Block Grant Act (CSBGA). Under CSBGA, Federal block grants for poverty programs are made to the various States for distribution to statutorily defined

  8. Min-Lee Associates, Inc. v. City of New York

    28 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)   Cited 8 times

    May 15, 1967 Judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 29, 1964, directing specific performance in favor of plaintiff, reversed, without costs, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment denied; order of said court, dated February 3, 1966 and made on defendant's motion for reconsideration, modified by striking out the second and third paragraphs thereof, which directed adherence to the original decision, etc., and by providing in lieu thereof that defendant's original cross

  9. Section 5602 - Appeals to the court of appeals by permission

    N.Y. CPLR 5602   Cited 1,154 times
    Discussing appeals by permission to New York Court of Appeals