§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Alicia Echevarria, Appellant,v.Matthew M. Wambua,, et al., Respondents.

Brief

9 Cited authorities

  1. EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.

    5 N.Y.3d 11 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 2,046 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that underwriter of initial public offering had fiduciary duty to disclose to issuer its "compensation arrangements with its customers," whereby it was to receive percentage of profits generated in post-offering resales

  2. Matter Hearst Corp. v. Clyne

    50 N.Y.2d 707 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 1,594 times
    Holding that courts are normally precluded from considering questions that, once alive, have become moot by change of circumstances

  3. Town of Riverhead v. N.Y. State Dep't of Envtl. Conservation (In re Ass'n for a Better Long Island, Inc.)

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2216 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 82 times   2 Legal Analyses

    2014-04-1 In the Matter of the ASSOCIATION FOR A BETTER LONG ISLAND, INC., et al., Petitioners, and Town of Riverhead et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION et al., Respondents. Smith, Finkelstein, Lundberg, Isler & Yakaboski, LLP, Riverhead (Frank A. Isler of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Andrew B. Ayers, Barbara D. Underwood and Andrea Oser of counsel), for respondents. Smith, Finkelstein, Lundberg, Isler & Yakaboski

  4. Matter of Pokoik v. Silsdorf

    40 N.Y.2d 769 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 113 times
    In Pokoik v. Silsdorf, 40 N.Y.2d 769, 390 N.Y.S.2d 49, 358 N.E.2d 874 (1976), Pokoik, the property owner, initially applied for a building permit to build an addition to his house.

  5. Telaro v. Telaro

    25 N.Y.2d 433 (N.Y. 1969)   Cited 121 times

    Argued October 28, 1969 Decided December 4, 1969 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, FREDERICK BACKER, J. Leonard C. Shalleck, Irving I. Erdheim and Milton P. Falk for appellant. Morris H. Halpern and Abraham J. Heller for respondent. BREITEL, J. This appeal involves an action by a wife to recover, inter alia, one half of some $24,800 withdrawn by her husband, defendant-respondent, from a brokerage account held at that time in the names of both

  6. Rocky Point Drive-In, L.P. v. Town of Brookhaven

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7513 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 19 times

    11-14-2013 ROCKY POINT DRIVE–IN, L.P., Appellant, v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN et al., Respondents. Bracken Margolin Besunder LLP, Islandia (Linda U. Margolin of counsel), for appellant. Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Garden City (Maureen T. Liccione and Robert V. Guido of counsel), and Annette Eaderesto, Town Attorney, Farmingville, for respondents. Davis & Prager, P.C., Patchogue (Larry Ray Davis of counsel), for Long Island Builders Institute, Inc., amicus curiae. Sarah Brancatella, Albany, for Association

  7. Matter of Burke v. Sugarman

    35 N.Y.2d 39 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 51 times
    In Burke, the petitioners alleged that illegal appointments were being made from outside an eligible list, or without regard to ranking on a list (see, id., at 42).

  8. Bradford School v. Ambach

    56 N.Y.2d 158 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 37 times
    In Bradford, we held that a school board's interest and responsibility for determining whether a teacher is properly certified was sufficient to fulfill the "zone of interest" test for standing to challenge the decision of the Commissioner of Education that overruled the school board's determination and awarded certification to a teacher.

  9. Min-Lee Associates, Inc. v. City of New York

    28 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)   Cited 8 times

    May 15, 1967 Judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 29, 1964, directing specific performance in favor of plaintiff, reversed, without costs, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment denied; order of said court, dated February 3, 1966 and made on defendant's motion for reconsideration, modified by striking out the second and third paragraphs thereof, which directed adherence to the original decision, etc., and by providing in lieu thereof that defendant's original cross