§Why CasetextPricing

Joseph Bennett,, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff,v.Michael Hucke, et al., Defendants, Alan Kirk, et al., Respondents.

Brief

4 Cited authorities

  1. Russin v. Picciano Son

    54 N.Y.2d 311 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 1,419 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[a]n implicit precondition to this duty to provide a safe place to work is that the party charged with that responsibility have the authority to control the activity bringing about the injury to enable it to avoid or correct an unsafe condition"

  2. Badr v. Hogan

    75 N.Y.2d 629 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that the trial court committed reversible error in permitting defense counsel to cross-examine plaintiff in contravention of the rule barring the use of extrinsic evidence to contradict a witness's answers on collateral matters — here, her denial that she had received public welfare funds to which she was not entitled — for the sole purpose of impeaching the witness's credibility

  3. Wing Wong v. King Sun Yee

    262 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that shareholders may be sued under Article 6 provided that they qualify as employers within the meaning of Section 190

  4. Claim of Reillo v. Energy Saver Insulation

    306 A.D.2d 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 4 times

    92840 Decided and Entered: June 26, 2003. Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed January 29, 2002, which ruled, inter alia, that the application of Fred Sutton to review decisions of a Workers' Compensation Law Judge filed October 9, 1997 and August 11, 2000 was untimely. Alan B. Pearl Associates P.C., Syosset (James M. Santos of counsel), for appellant. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Claire T. O'Keefe of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent