25 Cited authorities

  1. Zuckerman v. City of N.Y

    49 N.Y.2d 557 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 21,293 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Granting summary judgment as the city's arguments were considered speculation and this was "patently inadequate to establish the existence of a factual issue requiring a trial . . ."
  2. Winegrad v. N.Y. Univ. Medical Center

    64 N.Y.2d 851 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 13,780 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing the motion court's order granting the defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment where they failed to demonstrate, with admissible proof, that the claims against them should be dismissed
  3. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer

    81 N.Y.2d 494 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 3,039 times
    Holding that plaintiff's "§ 241 claim must fail because of the inadequacy of his allegations regarding the regulations defendants purportedly breached"
  4. Blake v. Neighborhood Hous. Serv. of N.Y.C.

    1 N.Y.3d 280 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 1,467 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an accident alone does not establish a Labor Law § 240 violation"
  5. Narducci v. Manhasset Bay Assoc

    96 N.Y.2d 259 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 933 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming summary judgment where falling glass injured plaintiff because material was not being hoisted nor was it part of a load that required securing for purposes of the work being undertaken
  6. Russin v. Picciano Son

    54 N.Y.2d 311 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 1,256 times
    Holding "[a]n implicit precondition to this duty to provide a safe place to work is that the party charged with that responsibility have the authority to control the activity bringing about the injury to enable it to avoid or correct an unsafe condition"
  7. Walls v. Turner Construction Company

    4 N.Y.3d 861 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 365 times
    In Walls, Turner Construction entered into a contract with a school district to serve as construction manager for a capital improvement project.
  8. Assaf v. Ropog Cab Corporation

    153 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)   Cited 338 times
    Approving plaintiff's objective medical evidence and detailed listing of injuries and of their effect
  9. Barnett v. Smith

    64 A.D.3d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 103 times

    No. 2008-07976. July 21, 2009. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Kathleen Smith and Steven Leventhal separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (McCarty III, J.), dated August 7, 2008, which granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to renew and reargue her opposition to their separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious

  10. Delahaye v. Saint Anns School

    40 A.D.3d 679 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 107 times
    In Delahaye, the plaintiff was injured on a construction site and commenced suit against the construction manager, Builders Group, among others.