16 Cited authorities

  1. Telegraphers v. Ry. Express Agency

    321 U.S. 342 (1944)   Cited 615 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the principles of J.I. Case apply to RLA cases
  2. Friends of Van Cortland Park, v. City of New York

    95 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 67 times
    Alienating parkland "requires the direct and specific approval of the State Legislature, plainly conferred"
  3. Dwyer v. Mazzola

    171 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)   Cited 85 times

    March 11, 1991 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.). Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, those branches of the appellant's motion which were for leave to conduct supplemental depositions of the plaintiffs John Dwyer and Anne Dwyer and for a supplemental physical examination of the plaintiff Matthew Dwyer are granted, and the depositions and physical examination shall be held at a time and place to be specified in a written notice of at least

  4. Blanco v. AT&T Co.

    90 N.Y.2d 757 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 69 times
    Holding that personal injury claim arising from repetitive stress injuries accrued at the time the plaintiffs began experiencing symptoms, but not at the time they discovered the nature of their injuries
  5. In the Matter of Jones v. Amicone

    27 A.D.3d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 33 times

    2004-05795. March 7, 2006. In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent City Council of the City of Yonkers dated June 27, 2003, which adopted a final environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and a special ordinance enacted October 16, 2003, authorizing and directing the respondent City of Yonkers to acquire certain properties, and an action for a judgment declaring that the respondent City of Yonkers

  6. Meyer v. Frank

    550 F.2d 726 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 76 times
    Stating that "[i]t is well settled that the federal courts have the power to toll statutes of limitations borrowed from state law in appropriate circumstances"
  7. Powell v. City of New York

    85 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 17 times

    No. 4845. June 7, 2011. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered January 27, 2010, which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment, denied plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment, and declared that neither Asphalt Green nor Bobby Wagner Walk is subject to the public trust doctrine, and therefore, the City of New York is not required to obtain legislative approval before commencing demolition, construction or operation of an access

  8. Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp.

    1 N.Y.2d 310 (N.Y. 1956)   Cited 125 times
    In Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp. (1 N.Y.2d 310, 318), the Court of Appeals held: "Essentially, the defense of laches consists of an unreasonable delay by a plaintiff to the prejudice of the defendant (Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N.Y., 325, 332).
  9. In re Angiolillo v. Town of Greenburgh

    290 A.D.2d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 27 times

    Nos. 2000-07054 2000-09948 Argued February 8, 2001. December 3, 2001. APPEAL by WBRC Corporation and Baker Roofing, in a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that certain building permits are null and void and that the subject property is dedicated for public use as a park, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court (Peter M. Leavitt, J.), entered July 11, 2000, in Westchester County, as declared that the building

  10. In re Barresi

    72 A.D.3d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 10 times

    No. 2009-02973. April 27, 2010. In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel a final determination by the respondents as to the petitioner's request for back pay and credit for sick leave time under General Municipal Law § 207-c, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kerins, J.), dated December 1, 2008, which granted the respondents' motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a)