15 Cited authorities

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer

    81 N.Y.2d 494 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 2,925 times
    Holding that plaintiff's "§ 241 claim must fail because of the inadequacy of his allegations regarding the regulations defendants purportedly breached"
  2. Pension Fund v. Marine Bank

    85 N.Y.2d 20 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 1,216 times
    Holding that the definition of deceptive acts and practices under GBL § 349 includes "representations or omissions"
  3. Spectrum Sys. Int'l Corp. v. Chem. Bank

    78 N.Y.2d 371 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 492 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the document at issue was exempt from discovery where "the narration relate[d] and integrate[d] the facts with the law firm's assessment of the client's legal position"
  4. D'Amico v. Christie

    71 N.Y.2d 76 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 426 times
    Holding that application of dram shop law "requires a commercial sale of alcohol"
  5. Bleiler v. Bodnar

    65 N.Y.2d 65 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 289 times
    Holding that a failure to take proper medical histories constitutes medical malpractice because taking a medical history is a crucial part of diagnosis and treatment, while the failure to provide competent medical personnel or promulgate appropriate emergency room rules constitutes ordinary negligence
  6. O'Neill v. Oakgrove Constr

    71 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 154 times
    Recognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials
  7. DiMichel v. S. Buffalo Ry. Co.

    80 N.Y.2d 184 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 117 times
    In DiMichel v. South Buffalo Ry. Co. (80 N.Y.2d 184, cert denied sub nom. Poole v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 510 U.S. 816), the Court of Appeals confronted the issue of whether films prepared by a defendant in a personal injury action were discoverable by a plaintiff before trial.
  8. Allied Irish Banks, P.L.C. v. Bank of America, N.A.

    252 F.R.D. 163 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 41 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Looking to basic requirements of Rule 26(b) in applying work product doctrine to non-party
  9. Cooley v. Carter-Wallace

    102 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 57 times

    July 13, 1984 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, John R. Tenney, J. Schepp D'Addario ( Francis R. D'Addario of counsel), for appellants. Mackenzie, Smith, Lewis, Michell Hughes ( Catherine A. Gale of counsel), for respondent. GREEN, J. The adequacy of the warning in a products liability case based on a failure to warn is, in all but the most unusual circumstances, a question of fact to be determined at trial. Special Term erred in this case finding the warning on the label of the product

  10. In re Megan-Racine Associates, Inc.

    189 B.R. 562 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1995)   Cited 35 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 501 dictates repair to state privilege law on state claims resolved in federal bankruptcy courts