15 Cited authorities

Ross v. Curtis-Palmer
81 N.Y.2d 494 (N.Y. 1993) Cited 3,594 times
Holding that plaintiff's "§ 241 claim must fail because of the inadequacy of his allegations regarding the regulations defendants purportedly breached"
Pension Fund v. Marine Bank
85 N.Y.2d 20 (N.Y. 1995) Cited 1,514 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the definition of deceptive acts and practices under GBL § 349 includes "representations or omissions"
Spectrum Sys. Int'l Corp. v. Chem. Bank
78 N.Y.2d 371 (N.Y. 1991) Cited 589 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the document at issue was exempt from discovery where "the narration relate[d] and integrate[d] the facts with the law firm's assessment of the client's legal position"
D'Amico v. Christie
71 N.Y.2d 76 (N.Y. 1987) Cited 467 times
Holding that application of dram shop law "requires a commercial sale of alcohol"
Bleiler v. Bodnar
65 N.Y.2d 65 (N.Y. 1985) Cited 327 times
Holding that a failure to take proper medical histories constitutes medical malpractice because taking a medical history is a crucial part of diagnosis and treatment, while the failure to provide competent medical personnel or promulgate appropriate emergency room rules constitutes ordinary negligence
O'Neill v. Oakgrove Constr
71 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1988) Cited 165 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials
DiMichel v. S. Buffalo Ry. Co.
80 N.Y.2d 184 (N.Y. 1992) Cited 130 times
In DiMichel v. South Buffalo Ry. Co., 80 N.Y.2d 184, 590 N.Y.S.2d 1, 604 N.E.2d 63, decided in 1992, the Court of Appeals ended the excesses of the practice.
Allied Irish Banks, P.L.C. v. Bank of America, N.A.
252 F.R.D. 163 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) Cited 61 times 2 Legal Analyses
Looking to basic requirements of Rule 26(b) in applying work product doctrine to non-party
Cooley v. Carter-Wallace
102 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984) Cited 62 times
July 13, 1984 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, John R. Tenney, J. Schepp D'Addario ( Francis R. D'Addario of counsel), for appellants. Mackenzie, Smith, Lewis, Michell Hughes ( Catherine A. Gale of counsel), for respondent. GREEN, J. The adequacy of the warning in a products liability case based on a failure to warn is, in all but the most unusual circumstances, a question of fact to be determined at trial. Special Term erred in this case finding the warning on the label of the product
In re Megan-Racine Associates, Inc.
189 B.R. 562 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1995) Cited 35 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Rule 501 dictates repair to state privilege law on state claims resolved in federal bankruptcy courts

Ambac Assurance Corporation, et al., Appellants,v.Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al., Respondents, Bank of America Corp., Defendant.

15 Cited authorities

Holding that plaintiff's "§ 241 claim must fail because of the inadequacy of his allegations regarding the regulations defendants purportedly breached"

Holding that the definition of deceptive acts and practices under GBL § 349 includes "representations or omissions"

Holding that the document at issue was exempt from discovery where "the narration relate[d] and integrate[d] the facts with the law firm's assessment of the client's legal position"

Holding that application of dram shop law "requires a commercial sale of alcohol"

Recognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials

In DiMichel v. South Buffalo Ry. Co., 80 N.Y.2d 184, 590 N.Y.S.2d 1, 604 N.E.2d 63, decided in 1992, the Court of Appeals ended the excesses of the practice.

Looking to basic requirements of Rule 26(b) in applying work product doctrine to non-party

Holding that Rule 501 dictates repair to state privilege law on state claims resolved in federal bankruptcy courts