§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.David Bookman, Appellant.

Brief

31 Cited authorities

  1. Terry v. Ohio

    392 U.S. 1 (1968)   Cited 38,116 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

  2. People v. Lopez

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1195 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 3,886 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an appeal waiver encompasses "any issue that does not involve a right of constitutional dimension going to "the very heart of the process," and ruling that a valid appeal waiver precludes review of claims that a sentence is harsh or excessive

  3. People v. Bradshaw

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8963 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 1,388 times
    Requiring colloquy before accepting waivers of right to appeal

  4. People v. Callahan

    80 N.Y.2d 273 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 1,145 times
    Holding that "a bargained-for waiver of the right to appeal is ineffective to the extent it impairs the defendant's ability to obtain appellate review" of unwaivable claims

  5. People v. Robinson

    97 N.Y.2d 341 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 492 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Declining to distinguish between criminal and traffic violations for the purposes of searches and seizures under New York law

  6. People v. Moore

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1249 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 255 times
    Beginning analysis with the "gunpoint stop" where officers acting on an anonymous tip had arrived at the scene and approached the defendant "who began to walk away"

  7. People v. McRay

    51 N.Y.2d 594 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 495 times
    Recognizing that a glassine envelope is a "'telltale sign of heroin'" and that passing one in a "furtive or evasive" manner provides probable cause to arrest (quoting People v. Alexander, 333 N.E.2d 157, 158 (N.Y. 1975))

  8. People v. Edwards

    95 N.Y.2d 486 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 129 times
    In People v. Edwards, 95 N.Y.2d 486, 719 N.Y.S.2d 202, 741 N.E.2d 876 (2000), the Court of Appeals reached the merits of a probable cause issue, decided by the trial court at the close of a suppression hearing.

  9. People v. Jones

    90 N.Y.2d 835 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 114 times
    Finding probable cause based on single exchange of unidentified object "in a manner typical of a drug sale," such as transfer of money in high drug location and "furtive" conduct

  10. People v. Millan

    69 N.Y.2d 514 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 132 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Millan we were concerned with the unfairness created by a particular category of cases — those in which the legal fiction of Penal Law § 265.15 (3) was alone both probable cause to arrest and sufficient to satisfy the People's burden of proof of possession of a gun merely because of the circumstance of the defendant's presence in the automobile where the weapon was found.