31 Cited authorities

  1. Terry v. Ohio

    392 U.S. 1 (1968)   Cited 33,578 times   70 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop
  2. People v. Lopez

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1195 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 3,577 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an appeal waiver encompasses "any issue that does not involve a right of constitutional dimension going to "the very heart of the process," and ruling that a valid appeal waiver precludes review of claims that a sentence is harsh or excessive
  3. People v. Bradshaw

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8963 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 1,405 times

    No. 237. 2011-12-13 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Jay Jomar BRADSHAW, Respondent. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Maria Park and Leonard Joblove of counsel), for appellant. Appellate Advocates, New York City (Erica Horwitz and Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for respondent. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges PIGOTT and JONES concur with Judge CIPARICK; Judge READ dissents in a separate opinion in which Judges GRAFFEO and SMITH concur. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney

  4. People v. Callahan

    80 N.Y.2d 273 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 1,133 times
    In Callahan, we held that the exception for challenges to the legality of the sentence addresses "the power of the court to impose the * * * sentence it chose" (80 N.Y.2d at 281).
  5. People v. Robinson

    97 N.Y.2d 341 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 366 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Declining to distinguish between criminal and traffic violations for the purposes of searches and seizures under New York law
  6. People v. McRay

    51 N.Y.2d 594 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 482 times
    Recognizing that a glassine envelope is a "telltale sign of heroin" and that the passing of a glassine envelope signals an illicit drug transaction rather than some innocuous act
  7. People v. Moore

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1249 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 215 times
    In Moore, we also said that "[a]n anonymous tip cannot provide reasonable suspicion to justify a seizure, except where that tip contains predictive information — such as information suggestive of criminal behavior — so that the police can test the reliability of the tip" (id. at 499 [emphasis added]).
  8. People v. Edwards

    95 N.Y.2d 486 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 103 times
    In People v. Edwards, 95 N.Y.2d 486, 719 N.Y.S.2d 202, 741 N.E.2d 876 (2000), the Court of Appeals reached the merits of a probable cause issue, decided by the trial court at the close of a suppression hearing.
  9. People v. Jones

    90 N.Y.2d 835 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 98 times
    Finding probable cause based on single exchange of unidentified object "in a manner typical of a drug sale," such as transfer of money in high drug location and "furtive" conduct
  10. People v. Millan

    69 N.Y.2d 514 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 127 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Millan we were concerned with the unfairness created by a particular category of cases — those in which the legal fiction of Penal Law § 265.