2011-10-25 John F. SMITH and Lisa Smith, Respondents, v. Marijane REILLY, Appellant. Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (Adam P. Mastroleo of counsel), for appellant. Brindisi, Murad, Brindisi, Pearlman, Julian & Pertz, Utica (Stephanie A. Palmer of counsel), for respondents. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (Adam P. Mastroleo of counsel), for appellant. Brindisi, Murad, Brindisi, Pearlman, Julian & Pertz, Utica (Stephanie A. Palmer of counsel), for
Argued December 4, 1919 Decided February 24, 1920 Carlos C. Alden and Don Vroman for appellants. Hamilton Ward and Irving W. Cole for respondent. McLAUGHLIN, J. This action was brought to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's intestate alleged to have been caused by the kick of a vicious horse. The complaint alleged that the defendants' testator purchased the horse "as a kicker * * *, knew that the said horse was a violent kicker and vicious in his habits and that he utterly failed and neglected
Argued October 18, 1889 Decided November 26, 1889 William Parken for appellants. Charles J. Patterson for respondent. DANFORTH, J. It is not lawful for any cow to run at large in any street or public place in this state (Laws of 1872, chap. 776), and it was assumed by the parties that the original complaint stated a good cause of action by alleging that on the 1st of April, 1885, a cow, owned by the defendants, was carelessly permitted to run at large and unrestrained upon a public highway in the
December Term, 1899. Robert Thorne, for the appellant. Edward L. Godfrey, for the respondent. INGRAHAM, J.: The plaintiff was injured by a horse belonging to the defendant. It appeared from the evidence that the plaintiff was a vendor of vegetables, and on the morning of June 26, 1897, went to Gansevoort market to make purchases; that while standing on the street engaged in loading his cart, two horses belonging to the defendant came along Gansevoort street going toward Greenwich street, the one
Argued June 5, 1872 Decided June 20, 1872 John K. Porter for the appellant. D. Pratt for the respondent. CHURCH, Ch. J. The plaintiff was injured while a passenger on the defendant's ferry boat, to be carried from New York to Hoboken, and the jury have found that the injury was occasioned by the defendant's negligence; and that the plaintiff was guilty of no negligence which contributed to it; and the General Term of the Common Pleas, who had power to review the facts as well as the law, has affirmed