§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Terrence C. O'Connor, a Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County. Terrence C. O'Connor, Petitioner; New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent.

Brief

25 Cited authorities

  1. Ungar v. Sarafite

    376 U.S. 575 (1964)   Cited 1,901 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court committed no constitutional violation in denying one-week continuance request for counsel to prepare because, in part, the defendant (who was a lawyer) sought relief on "the day of the scheduled hearing" and was "familiar with the court's practice of not granting adjournments"

  2. Kimmel v. State

    2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 3689 (N.Y. 2017)   Cited 73 times
    Concluding that courts under New York law should look "first to the plain language of the statute as the best evidence of legislative intent"

  3. Matter of Gray v. Adduci

    73 N.Y.2d 741 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 125 times
    Stating that "[h]earsay evidence can be the basis of an administrative determination"

  4. Matter of Jung

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8155 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 51 times
    In Matter of Jung (11 NY3d 365) the Court of Appeals held that trial courts should insure that incarcerated litigants have a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

  5. Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v. Geico Ins. Co.

    2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 51518 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)   Cited 11 times

    2015-2806 Q C 11-03-2017 Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D., as Assignee of Obunike, Norbert Ebere, Appellant, v. Geico Ins. Co., Respondent. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff, Esq.), for respondent. MICHELLE WESTON, J.P., MICHAEL L. PESCE, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ PRESENT: : The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff, Esq.), for respondent. Appeal from an

  6. Liang v. Wei Ji

    155 A.D.3d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)   Cited 6 times

    2015–12444 Index No. 703829/15 11-29-2017 Gary LIANG, appellant, v. WEI JI, et al., respondents. Wang Law Office, PLLC, Flushing, N.Y. (Chunyu Jean Wang of counsel), for appellant. Alliance Law PLLC, New York, N.Y. (Wei Ji pro se of counsel), respondent pro se. Wang Law Office, PLLC, Flushing, N.Y. (Chunyu Jean Wang of counsel), for appellant. Alliance Law PLLC, New York, N.Y. (Wei Ji pro se of counsel), respondent pro se. RANDALL T. ENG, P.J., REINALDO E. RIVERA, SHERI S. ROMAN, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY

  7. In re Simon

    2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6855 (N.Y. 2016)   Cited 4 times

    10-20-2016 In the Matter of Alan M. SIMON, a Justice of the Spring Valley Village Court and the Ramapo Town Court, Rockland County, Petitioner. State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent. Kantor, Davidoff, Mandelker, Twomey, Gallanty & Kesten, P.C., New York City (Lawrence A. Mandelker of counsel), and Joseph A. Maria, P.C., White Plains, for petitioner. Robert H. Tembeckjian, Commission on Judicial Conduct, Albany (Edward Lindner, Mary C. Farrington, Mark Levine and Pamela Tishman of counsel)

  8. In re Feinberg

    5 N.Y.3d 206 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 14 times
    Accepting the recommendation of the Commission on Judicial Conduct that then-Surrogate Feinberg should be removed from office

  9. In the Matter of Mason

    100 N.Y.2d 56 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 16 times

    53 Decided May 1, 2003. Proceeding, pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 22 and Judiciary Law § 44, to review a determination of respondent State Commission on Judicial Conduct, dated June 21, 2002, that petitioner was guilty of misconduct and should be removed from the office of Justice of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial District. Paul T. Gentile, for petitioner. Gerald Stern, for respondent. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur

  10. Matter of Duckman

    92 N.Y.2d 141 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 21 times
    Rejecting argument that "actual impartiality" counteracted any perceived biases

  11. Section 510.13 - Notice to the Attorney General

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 510.13

    Unless such notice has already been given pursuant to section 510.9(c) of this Part, where a party or an amicus asserts in its brief on appeal that a statute, or a portion of a statute, is unconstitutional, notice shall be given to the Attorney General in writing at the time the party or amicus files its brief, and a certification of the notification shall be included in the brief. The notification and a copy of the brief shall be sent to the Solicitor General, Department of Law, The Capitol, Albany