§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of the Claim of Melody Wohlfeil, Respondent,v.Sharel Ventures, LLC, Respondent, Workers' Compensation Board, Appellant.

Brief

37 Cited authorities

  1. Rubeis v. Aqua Club

    3 N.Y.3d 408 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 195 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that test is whether plaintiff is unemployable, not whether plaintiff is in a persistent vegetative state

  2. Raynor v. Chrysler

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8183 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 82 times   1 Legal Analyses

    2011-11-15 In the Matter of Randy RAYNOR, Claimant, v. LANDMARK CHRYSLER et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. Hamberger & Weiss, Rochester (Karen Darling and Ronald E. Weiss of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven C. Wu, Barbara D. Underwood and Benjamin N. Gutman of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent. CIPARICK Hamberger & Weiss, Rochester (Karen Darling and Ronald E. Weiss of counsel)

  3. Matter of Tobin v. Steisel

    64 N.Y.2d 254 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 145 times
    In Matter of Tobin v. Steisel, 64 N.Y.2d 254, 485 N.Y.S.2d 730, 475 N.E.2d 101 [1985], the Court of Appeals held that if a disability pension applicant's accidental line-of-duty injury precipitated the development of a latent condition or aggravated a preexisting condition, resulting in disability, the applicant is entitled to a line-of-duty disability pension.

  4. Zamora v. N.Y. Neurologic Assocs.

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3357 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 50 times   2 Legal Analyses

    2012-05-1 In the Matter of the Claim of Rocio ZAMORA, Respondent, v. NEW YORK NEUROLOGIC ASSOCIATES et al., Appellants. Workers' Compensation Board, Appellant. Vecchione, Vecchione & Connors, Garden City Park (Michael F. Vecchione, Brooklyn, and Sean J. McKinley of counsel), for New York Neurologic Associates and another, appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Paul Groenwegen, Albany, Barbara D. Underwood, Brooklyn, and Andrew D. Bing, Albany, of counsel), for New York State

  5. Bolt v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

    30 N.Y.3d 1065 (N.Y. 2018)   Cited 38 times

    No. 51 SSM 34 No. 52 SSM 35 No. 53 SSM 36 01-09-2018 In the Matter of Ericka BOLT, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Appellant. In the Matter of Amira Beatty, Respondent, v. City of New York, et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Terrell Williams, Respondent, v. City of New York, et al., Appellants. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Melanie T. West, Richard Dearing and Deborah A. Brenner of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled proceeding. The

  6. Johannesen v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development

    84 N.Y.2d 129 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that plaintiff's asthma, caused by exposure to second-hand smoke, is covered by Workers' Compensation, explaining that "accidental injury" is a "term of art," and that "[t]he seriously adverse environmental conditions to which claimant was subjected as part of her job and workplace reasonably qualify as an unusual hazard"

  7. Burgos v. Citywide Cent. Ins. Program

    148 A.D.3d 1493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)   Cited 18 times

    523075 03-30-2017 In the Matter of the Claim of LIDIA BURGOS, Appellant, v. CITYWIDE CENTRAL INSURANCE PROGRAM et al., Respondents. WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent. Law Office of Michael D. Uysal, PLLC, New York City (Michael D. Uysal of counsel), for appellant. Weiss, Wexler & Wornow, PC, New York City (J. Evan Perigoe of counsel), for Citywide Central Insurance Program and another, respondents. McCarthy, J.P. Before: , Garry, Lynch, Devine and Mulvey, JJ. Law Office of Michael D. Uysal

  8. Campbell v. Interstate Materials Corp.

    135 A.D.3d 1276 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)   Cited 18 times

    01-28-2016 In the Matter of the Claim of Robert CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. INTERSTATE MATERIALS CORPORATION et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. Law Offices of Joseph Romano, New York City (Joseph A. Romano of counsel), for appellant. Weiss, Wexler & Wornow, P.C., New York City (J. Evan Perigoe of counsel), for Interstate Materials Corporation and another, respondents. McCARTHY, J.P. Law Offices of Joseph Romano, New York City (Joseph A. Romano of counsel), for appellant. Weiss

  9. In Matter of Brisson v. Onondaga

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1193 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 28 times

    11. Argued January 5, 2006. Decided February 16, 2006. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered November 24, 2004. The Appellate Division affirmed a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board which had ruled that the County of Onondaga was not entitled to any offset of workers' compensation benefits after November 4, 2001 against the third-party settlement paid to claimant. Matter of Brisson

  10. Burgos v. Citywide Cent. Ins. Program

    30 N.Y.3d 990 (N.Y. 2017)   Cited 14 times

    11-16-2017 In the Matter of the Claim of Lidia BURGOS, Appellant, v. CITYWIDE CENTRAL INSURANCE PROGRAM et al., Respondents, Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. Law Offices of Michael D. Uysal, PLLC, New York City (Michael D. Uysal of counsel), for appellant. Weiss, Wexler & Wornow, P.C., New York City (J. Evan Perigoe of counsel), for Citywide Central Insurance Program and another, respondents. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Laura Etlinger, Barbara D. Underwood and Andrew

  11. Section 300.13 - Administrative review, full board review, and applications for board reconsideration

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 12 § 300.13   Cited 232 times

    (a)Definitions. (1)Administrative review means an administrative appeal from a decision of a compensation claims referee, under section 23 of the Workers' Compensation Law, or an administrative appeal of a finalized administrative determination as set forth in Part 313 of this Title. (2)Full board review means an administrative appeal from a decision of the board pursuant to section 23 of the Workers' Compensation Law. Such review is discretionary unless a board member dissents from the ruling regarding

  12. Section 500.22 - Motions for permission to appeal in civil cases

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.22   Cited 43 times

    (a) Filing and notice. In addition to the submission in digital format required by subsection 500.22(e) of this section, movant shall file an original and one copy of its motion, unless permitted to proceed pursuant to subsection 500.21(g), with proof of service of one copy on each other party. The motion shall be noticed for a return date in compliance with CPLR 5516 and subsection 500.21(b) of this Part. (b) Content. The motion shall be a single document, bound on the left, and shall contain in