People v. Argyris
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8220 (N.Y. 2014) Cited 73 timesIn People v. Argyris, 24 N.Y.3d 1138, 3 N.Y.S.3d 711, 27 N.E.3d 425 [2014], a case involving vehicular stops, a divided Court of Appeals debated the nature of corroboration required for an anonymous tip.
Friends of Van Cortland Park, v. City of New York
95 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 2001) Cited 77 timesAlienating parkland "requires the direct and specific approval of the State Legislature, plainly conferred"
Union Square Park Cmty. Coal., Inc. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Parks & Recreation
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1207 (N.Y. 2014) Cited 42 timesRejecting public trust claim
Powell v. City of New York
85 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011) Cited 21 timesNo. 4845. June 7, 2011. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered January 27, 2010, which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment, denied plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment, and declared that neither Asphalt Green nor Bobby Wagner Walk is subject to the public trust doctrine, and therefore, the City of New York is not required to obtain legislative approval before commencing demolition, construction or operation of an access
In re Angiolillo v. Town of Greenburgh
290 A.D.2d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001) Cited 31 timesFinding that parklike land was for parkway use, and not public park, and thus no approval was needed
Riverview Partners, LP v. City of Peekskill
273 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000) Cited 16 timesSubmitted April 17, 2000. July 26, 2000. In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that certain property is not a public park, the defendant appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated February 3, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment, granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, and declared that the subject property was not a public park. Florence Smith, Peekskill, N.Y. (Russell A. Smith of counsel),
Matter of Lazore v. Board of Trustees
191 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993) Cited 18 timesMarch 4, 1993 Appeal from the Supreme Court, St. Lawrence County (Duskas, J.). Harvey, J. On July 21, 1950, the Village of Massena in St. Lawrence County acquired a 9.2-acre parcel of land bordering the Grasse River. The purpose of the purchase was, inter alia, to "provide a site for the erection of a Village Garage; to provide a site for the storage of Village-owned equipment * * * [and] to provide a site for recreational purposes upon that portion not needed for other purposes". On May 7, 1991
Croton-On-Hudson v. Cty of Westchester
38 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972) Cited 14 timesMarch 31, 1972 In an action for an injunction, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 22, 1972, which denied its motion for a preliminary injunction. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. In our opinion, the record establishes that the approximately 20 acres of land which the defendant county proposes to excavate and use as a solid waste disposal site were acquired for public park purposes by a special borrowing and have been used as such
Williams v. Gallatin
229 N.Y. 248 (N.Y. 1920) Cited 95 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that a safety museum was foreign to park purposes
People v. Brooklyn Queens Transit Corp.
273 N.Y. 394 (N.Y. 1937) Cited 29 timesDiscussing dedications of property to public use
Section 500.1 - General requirements
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1 Cited 1 times(a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation