§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Patrick A. Asaro, Appellant.

Brief

3 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Rosario

    9 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1961)   Cited 1,649 times
    Holding that trial court erred by failing to compel prosecution to turn over witnesses' prior statements relating to their trial testimony

  2. Frye v. United States

    293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923)   Cited 4,494 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that expert testimony must be based on scientific methods that are sufficiently established and accepted

  3. People v. DaGata

    86 N.Y.2d 40 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Argued May 1, 1995 Decided June 8, 1995 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Thomas V. Mallon, J. Richard E. Mischel, P.C., New York City (Richard E. Mischel, Linda Goldman and Julie Miller of counsel), for appellant. James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney of Suffolk County, Riverhead (Patricia A. Murphy of counsel), for respondent. SMITH, J. The issues here are whether (1) FBI notes related to a one-page DNA testing report are within the