§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Town of North Hempstead, Appellant-Respondent,v.County of Nassau, Respondent-Appellant.

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. Jackson v. Board of Educ

    30 A.D.3d 57 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 80 times
    In Jackson, the plaintiff was employed by Aramark Educational Services, the exclusive food services contractor for the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT).

  2. Pataki v. State Assembly

    4 N.Y.3d 75 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 22 times
    In Pataki v New York State Assembly (4 NY3d 75, 100 [2004, Rosenblatt, J., concurring]), Judge Rosenblatt noted that the separation concept goes back to our first State Constitution in 1777, which was written a decade prior to the United States Constitution.

  3. In re Fulton-Montgomery Community College

    80 A.D.3d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 7 times

    No. 508164. December 2, 2010. APPEALS from (1) two judgments of the Supreme Court, Saratoga County (Frank B. Williams, J.), entered August 27, 2009 and January 20, 2010 in proceeding No. 1 pursuant to CPLR article 78, and (2) two judgments of that court, entered August 27, 2009 and January 20, 2010 in proceeding No. 2 pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgments in proceeding No. 1 dismissed petitioner's application to review a determination of respondent County of Saratoga denying petitioner's request

  4. Town of N. Hempstead v. Cnty. of Nassau

    102 A.D.3d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 5 times

    2013-01-16 In the Matter of Town of NORTH HEMPSTEAD, appellant-respondent, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, respondent-appellant. Richard S. Finkel, Town Attorney, Manhasset, N.Y. (Mitchell L. Pitnick and Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, of counsel), for appellant-respondent. John Ciampoli, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Jackie L. Gross of counsel), for respondent-appellant. REINALDO E. RIVERA Richard S. Finkel, Town Attorney, Manhasset, N.Y. (Mitchell L. Pitnick and Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, of counsel),

  5. Matter of Nypirg v. Dinkins

    83 N.Y.2d 377 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 21 times

    Argued February 17, 1994 Decided March 22, 1994 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J. Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Timothy J. O'Shaughnessy and Kristin M. Helmers of counsel), for appellants. Sam Sue, New York City, and John A. Gresham for New York Public Interest Research Group and others, respondents. Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen Hamilton, New York City (David S. Miller and Thomas J. Moloney of

  6. Lamb v. Esopus

    35 A.D.3d 1004 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 6 times

    No. 500798. December 14, 2006. Kane, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McCarthy, J.), entered August 25, 2005 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to compel respondent to reinstate petitioner to her former position as a building department aide. Thomas P. Halley, Poughkeepsie, for appellant. Peter F. Matera, West Park, for respondent. Before: Carpinello, J.P., Rose and Lahtinen, JJ. Beginning in 2001, petitioner was

  7. In the Matter of County of Suffolk v. King

    18 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 7 times

    97170. May 12, 2005. Carpinello, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Stein, J.), entered August 2, 2004 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition. Before: Crew III, J.P., Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. The case at bar implicates the statutory mechanisms for the financing of state community colleges. As a general rule, the home counties of nonresident students pay such institutions for a portion of

  8. Matter of Gallagher v. Regan

    42 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 38 times
    In Matter of Gallagher v Regan (42 N.Y.2d 230, supra), this Court articulated the checks-and-balances principle for such controversies, known as the doctrine of legislative equivalency.

  9. Heron v. City of Binghamton

    307 A.D.2d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 8 times

    93617 Decided and Entered: July 10, 2003. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Monserrate, J.), entered July 3, 2002 in Broome County, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to reinstate petitioner to his former position as Director of Code Enforcement. Gregory J. Poland, Corporation Counsel, Binghamton, for appellants. Aswad Ingraham, Binghamton (Richard N. Aswad of counsel), for respondent. Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen

  10. Amato v. State of New York

    131 Misc. 2d 1049 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1986)   Cited 9 times

    May 12, 1986 Schwartzberg Sack (Robert Sack of counsel), for plaintiff. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (William P. Kleen of counsel), for defendants. GERARD M. WEISBERG, J. In his memorandum approving a 1979 amendment to the Education Law, then Governor Hugh L. Carey described the Fashion Institute of Technology (F.I.T.) as being "unique among the State's" community colleges. (Executive memorandum, "Community College Programs", 1979 McKinney's Session Laws of NY, at 1773.) Our research has disclosed