67 Cited authorities

  1. Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc.

    478 U.S. 697 (1986)   Cited 218 times
    Holding that “the First Amendment is not implicated by the enforcement of” laws “directed at unlawful conduct having nothing to do with ... expressive activity”
  2. Abate v. Mundt

    403 U.S. 182 (1971)   Cited 188 times
    Holding that a local government had properly justified a local government reapportionment plan with a 11.9% maximum population deviation due to a desire to preserve political subdivisions
  3. Klostermann v. Cuomo

    61 N.Y.2d 525 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 377 times
    In Klostermann, the public agencies involved were in repeated noncompliance with the command of Mental Hygiene Law § 29.15 (g), which required preparation of a written service plan, with prescribed contents, for every person discharged from state psychiatric hospitals.
  4. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York

    41 N.Y.2d 205 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 370 times

    Argued October 12, 1976 Decided December 22, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE STARKE, J. W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (James G. Greilsheimer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Frederick R. Livingston, Jay W. Waks and William C. Zifchak, New York City, for respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for intervenor

  5. People v. Elmer

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5125 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 103 times

    2012-06-27 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Carol ELMER, Respondent. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin O. Cooper, Appellant. Nicole Duvé, District Attorney, Canton (Amanda N. Nissen of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled action. Richard V. Manning, Parishville, for respondent in the first above-entitled action. JONES Nicole Duvé, District Attorney, Canton (Amanda N. Nissen of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled action. Richard

  6. Commonwealth of the N. Mariana Islands v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3018 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 79 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase “possession or custody” in § 5225(b) requires actual, and not merely constructive, possession
  7. Castro v. United Container Machinery Group

    96 N.Y.2d 398 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 107 times
    In Castro and Meis, the words of the statute alone answered the question before us. Partial loss of multiple fingers, and loss of a thumb, simply do not fit the clear literal terms of the statute.
  8. Fleming v. Graham

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2502 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 84 times

    No. 41. Argued February 13, 2008. Decided March 20, 2008. APPEAL, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, from an order of that Court, entered November 14, 2006. The Appellate Division affirmed, insofar as appealed from, so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (David I. Schmidt, J.; op 2005 NY Slip Op 30268[U]), as had denied third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. The following

  9. People v. Roe

    542 N.E.2d 610 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 144 times
    Upholding a depraved indifference conviction where the defendant killed an unwitting victim during a "game" of "Polish Roulette."
  10. Washington Post v. Ins Dept

    61 N.Y.2d 557 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 158 times
    Stating that promises of confidentiality by a state agency do not affect the status of documents as records subject to required disclosure under FOIL, nor do such promises affect the applicability of any exemption under FOIL's provisions