§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Daniel Floyd, Appellant.

Brief

36 Cited authorities

  1. Waller v. Georgia

    467 U.S. 39 (1984)   Cited 2,087 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant's public trial right was violated even though the district court released a transcript of the closed proceedings to the public

  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of California

    464 U.S. 501 (1984)   Cited 1,757 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that media have a right of access to voir dire

  3. Presley v. Georgia

    558 U.S. 209 (2010)   Cited 632 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment applies to jury selection

  4. Johnson v. Zerbst

    304 U.S. 458 (1938)   Cited 8,795 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a waiver of constitutional rights must be knowing and intelligent

  5. People v. Gray

    86 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 3,227 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the issue of evidentiary sufficiency must be preserved for appellate review

  6. People v. Seaberg

    74 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 1,837 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting Bourne

  7. In re Oliver

    333 U.S. 257 (1948)   Cited 1,692 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding this right to be binding on the states through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

  8. People v. Howard

    50 N.Y.2d 583 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 415 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting flight plus indicia of criminal activity, such as another arrest, may create probable cause under Section 195.05

  9. People v. Kan

    78 N.Y.2d 54 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 240 times
    Finding that the closure of the court including the exclusion of defendant's family during the testimony of an accomplice cooperating witness violated defendant's right to a public trial, given that the witness had previously testified in front of defendant's parents, had testified that he did not fear defendant's family, and defendant had a greater interest in having her family present because of a language barrier

  10. Gibbons v. Savage

    555 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 122 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under Waller, insufficient space because of the size of the venire and the risk of tainting the jury pool are not “compelling reasons” for closure

  11. Section 4 - [Effective Until 9/1/2024] Sittings of courts to be public

    N.Y. Jud. Law § 4   Cited 249 times
    Stating that, absent exceptions not relevant here, “[t]he sittings of every court within this state shall be public, and every citizen may freely attend the same....”

  12. Section 12 - Rights of persons accused of crime

    N.Y. Civ. Rights Law § 12   Cited 205 times
    Guaranteeing right to a public trial in state bill of rights