42 Cited authorities

Brigham City v. Stuart
547 U.S. 398 (2006) Cited 2,569 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding subjective intent of officers does not control exigency analysis
Katz v. United States
389 U.S. 347 (1967) Cited 12,447 times 74 Legal Analyses
Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"
United States v. Knights
534 U.S. 112 (2001) Cited 1,805 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a "warrantless search . . ., supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation, was reasonable . . . [under] the Fourth Amendment"
Kyllo v. United States
533 U.S. 27 (2001) Cited 1,603 times 41 Legal Analyses
Holding that the use of a thermal imager to detect heat radiating from a home was a search
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
422 U.S. 873 (1975) Cited 3,293 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that it violated the Fourth Amendment to stop and "question [a vehicle's] occupants [about their immigration status] when the only ground for suspicion [was] that the occupants appear[ed] to be of Mexican ancestry"
South Dakota v. Opperman
428 U.S. 364 (1976) Cited 3,009 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that an inventory search was constitutionally permissible in part because there was "no suggestion" that the search "was a pretext concealing an investigatory police motive"
Colorado v. Bertine
479 U.S. 367 (1987) Cited 1,839 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that the decision to seize need be "on the basis of something other than suspicion of evidence of criminal activity"
Wyoming v. Houghton
526 U.S. 295 (1999) Cited 978 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that a search of an automobile and the containers within it is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment if the officers have probable cause to believe the automobile contains contraband
Maryland v. Garrison
480 U.S. 79 (1987) Cited 1,242 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the validity of a warrant must be assessed based on information officers knew or had a duty to know at the time they obtained the warrant
Warden v. Hayden
387 U.S. 294 (1967) Cited 2,676 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Fourth Amendment allows a search for evidence when there is "probable cause ... to believe that the evidence sought will aid in a particular apprehension or conviction"

The People, Respondent,v.Stephen DeProspero, Appellant.

42 Cited authorities

Holding subjective intent of officers does not control exigency analysis

Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"

Holding that a "warrantless search . . ., supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation, was reasonable . . . [under] the Fourth Amendment"

Holding that the use of a thermal imager to detect heat radiating from a home was a search

Holding that it violated the Fourth Amendment to stop and "question [a vehicle's] occupants [about their immigration status] when the only ground for suspicion [was] that the occupants appear[ed] to be of Mexican ancestry"

Holding that an inventory search was constitutionally permissible in part because there was "no suggestion" that the search "was a pretext concealing an investigatory police motive"

Holding that the decision to seize need be "on the basis of something other than suspicion of evidence of criminal activity"

Holding that a search of an automobile and the containers within it is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment if the officers have probable cause to believe the automobile contains contraband

Holding that the validity of a warrant must be assessed based on information officers knew or had a duty to know at the time they obtained the warrant

Holding that the Fourth Amendment allows a search for evidence when there is "probable cause ... to believe that the evidence sought will aid in a particular apprehension or conviction"